From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33A9B1E511; Fri, 17 Jul 2026 01:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=211.75.126.72 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784251439; cv=none; b=rrXrcc/uIbJJcFu7v1O1n0fRFOTCBWqtlnJWgZNNeVW1DguCBQLf8X3lWAqMTyR1DK/Wnu1gP7OEsXDy8JRqicpuOjkx3J5ZmXHSM4EDgcgKLFw/LZ/wqILlUrKQwbJFdlGVFfH78aE57B+++xXOZGWL0m9b5sYkKxlKTpYUamk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784251439; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Y1rwyudTopHEsuuUJ8qlzz3q263qhRB6UWGjlEGcZRA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=RWATWI8ufsYJHLBe6qOuTRp5AbmgrhzfHJffR39bwZd6U9Hz56/9flHEUHhF+wBF5cCeh2SjNR4DpmcSI1XOG/kamNtup1nwiy7N0+G1lkn03z0ewAgkgbB7iG1CRBC9uvpjqLaVOR3d25vyk0dM+r//PTyCGVnQ/l1pCASLlzI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=realtek.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=realtek.com header.i=@realtek.com header.b=OvZwfedA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=211.75.126.72 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=realtek.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=realtek.com header.i=@realtek.com header.b="OvZwfedA" X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.80 with qID 66H1NqFT24037274, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=realtek.com; s=dkim; t=1784251432; bh=Y1rwyudTopHEsuuUJ8qlzz3q263qhRB6UWGjlEGcZRA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=OvZwfedAGW4Xt1FXwZm0HXHlXsFa8xJA7HrT/q2AIUS85yR81+4vRB2k8K1aaCql2 58pv6+jCruuTBNfl0vq3E84wEa32l8n7Kl2pOqKXG1xD0xsiYbkoYc74LSOyFD9c5l hywO2nifGJs6l7HXfxO3qa604+DbwLxmjOnXptLnLsnpCFHnztdVIhIscd5OfHl/YF d2swYQPTBR0ffh1lyHmGVhxD1KOggg7Bseijl9eYYe2+RJ1FbFBBvc59oi72YxWJ2v zxEqXWyTjP0Iokoletx++5rfSwIq8z+VVUQd4UP+xvak2Es/grrgfnWBmLE51KVqqX UdK7wMHjQL6IQ== Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtkexhmbs04.realtek.com.tw[10.21.1.54]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/3.29/5.94) with ESMTPS id 66H1NqFT24037274 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:23:52 +0800 Received: from RTKEXHMBS05.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.55) by RTKEXHMBS04.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.17; Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:23:52 +0800 Received: from RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.56) by RTKEXHMBS05.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.17; Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:23:52 +0800 Received: from RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw ([::1]) by RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::e6fd:5a3f:8946:92c4%10]) with mapi id 15.02.2562.017; Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:23:52 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: Louis Kotze CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/4] wifi: rtw89: advertise WFA-certified EHT capabilities for 8922a Thread-Topic: [PATCH 0/4] wifi: rtw89: advertise WFA-certified EHT capabilities for 8922a Thread-Index: AQHc24E+LCWBeDxCEkyQ4AMls4NF7bYAs9gggGQrSACADHRN0A== Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 01:23:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: <7e092f6cf82c4bb18b59ba5eca40dbb5@realtek.com> <20260709103138.1269594-1-loukot@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20260709103138.1269594-1-loukot@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-TW Content-Language: zh-TW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Louis Kotze wrote: > Only the EML capabilities patch has an explicit improvement: in A/B > testing on my RTL8922AU against a TP-Link Deco BE63, ML association > without it came up with a single link, and with it both the 5 GHz > and 6 GHz links are set up (debugfs link-1/link-2, active_links > behaving as expected for EMLSR), stable across 60+ hour soaks. The > other three were no-regression only, which is part of why v2 drops > them. It is also like other features.=20 With this declaration, it will handshake two links in protocol point of view, so you can see two links in debugfs, but actually it operates on one of the links since driver isn't implemented to configure hardware and firmware.=20 > v2 is therefore that single patch, and follows. So, I'd defer this patch. Internally, we are still cooking to enable this feature. Ping-Ke