From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:52314 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932954AbdBQKbz (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Feb 2017 05:31:55 -0500 Subject: Re: [linux-stable] 4fc2942b6e kernel BUG at kernel/time/hrtimer.c:109! To: Thomas Gleixner References: <20170217052607.glbumukvoz4pilvt@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <0f58a1d0-a2e6-9430-7883-68e986ccb4c0@arm.com> Cc: kernel test robot , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tomasz Nowicki , Christoffer Dall , Sasha Levin , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Johannes Berg From: Marc Zyngier Message-ID: (sfid-20170217_113202_710503_38C59395) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:31:52 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 17/02/17 10:16, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >> On 17/02/17 09:28, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, kernel test robot wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Marc, >>>> >>>> We find this oops in linux-4.4.y. The gcc-6 compiled mainline kernel is fine. >> >> The last bit is worrying, as mainline has the exact same bug. Has it >> been tested the same way? > > The thing is that we reverted that patch in mainline: > > See: commit 82e88ff1ea948d83125a8aaa7c9809f03ccc500f Ah, right. It got nuked as part of the whole MONOTONIC_RAW blunder. > I don't know why I reverted that as well. I should have kept it. Darn. I > cherry pick it and send it linus wards next week. Yes, I still think this single patch is a valuable sanity check. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...