RE: [PATCH v2 next] wifi: rtw89: mcc: prevent shift wrapping in rtw89_core_mlsr_switch()

[Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>]

Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> wrote:
> Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > The "link_id" value comes from the user via debugfs.  If it's larger than BITS_PER_LONG then
> > that would result in shift wrapping and potentially an out of bounds access later.  In fact, we
> > can limit it to IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS (15).
> >
> > Fortunately, only root can write to debugfs files so the security impact is minimal.
> >
> > Fixes: 9dd85e739ce0 ("wifi: rtw89: debug: add mlo_mode dbgfs")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > Use IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS as a limit instead of BITS_PER_LONG.
> > It's stricter and also more informative.
> >
> >  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
> > index 49447668cbf3..3604a8e15df0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
> > @@ -5239,7 +5239,8 @@ int rtw89_core_mlsr_switch(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct
> > rtw89_vif *rtwvif,
> >         if (unlikely(!ieee80211_vif_is_mld(vif)))
> >                 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >
> > -       if (unlikely(!(usable_links & BIT(link_id)))) {
> > +       if (unlikely(link_id >= IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS ||
> > +                    !(usable_links & BIT(link_id)))) {
> >                 rtw89_warn(rtwdev, "%s: link id %u is not usable\n", __func__,
> >                            link_id);
> >                 return -ENOLINK;
> > --
> > 2.47.2
> 
> It looks good to me.
> Thank you.

I will add a tag during committing. 

Reviewed-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>