From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A2F333ADB9 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 09:07:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768813627; cv=none; b=M7FRHhZfg+H+sdMZGpvuYrbR94ERAlNXh+E7TIrb8v3hUl+Z6vKf3oYdet/m+9Og5w+SIvMfzK0LvBlFb77irmEmaTzVL8FdpfxrbSyVPdw5VTBd5G9htaU/Qf690/vgAyCslaRK5oN/bmYevcARuYyGVdmA01uNtA4ph281R4s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768813627; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yUmKGzfICBgcVDjhoiDLhfCE8S3gfooHW42osFOZeWM=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=XgWFUmxPdKKdBRnNpyX5iOM24Hk9CBzdJpFs18TrpxbUY2Kd/ordzMiNRNg76NuAcoHkptZQ+eSa8Dj4Qcrk4SpXTo6T4BFjrL7HIv8KFoC+WB+QR/Y6Dch/46tliNnIMq+HRrKrUpv767h/vTHac8KShyQ7A7+JBcyb2DQORf8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=nRH1yFlh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="nRH1yFlh" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=JOUW1qy9T0O5XHErfzHrodKptBYNhGEyrLVXyYMuYuY=; t=1768813626; x=1770023226; b=nRH1yFlhFMayz/ld85ldP5HKSeLdD5qg2z85rnHFH08v8v9 Z2WNjsjegHb1V22OlFzD/hoQy1Gx4pea7QLwofLda67biyaGJaotnPKeLuDOtNdHUBkYoVpZ6+laQ GBXT+307hgE5ngLbg9R6Kau/P3YsI87F1VMpwd8bKitDMcVL8jf1oK1D8WgPQNMTVxEb1/qv6ppE0 mcdttfLkIzCI8JJsGqnCKUK2XPtkUDzq/A4WLqnNn5jUR9sY7NP2fakaDQfhPaWEKpurOqOZ6XEli qqkmm7fISKmK9MCWww2fBZmpNvbfIkAHeXGQdU+YBTmI8w7GNHz/WMSrBevvOArA==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vhlDt-0000000Fow0-1h8d; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 10:06:57 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] wifi: mt76: kernel 6.18 compatibility and txpower reporting fix From: Johannes Berg To: Lucid Duck , nbd@nbd.name, lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 10:06:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20260115230252.43391-1-lucid_duck@justthetip.ca> (sfid-20260116_000600_198058_1F58BA40) References: <20260115230252.43391-1-lucid_duck@justthetip.ca> (sfid-20260116_000600_198058_1F58BA40) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.56.2 (3.56.2-2.fc42) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned Hi, I don't know who you are and if you're serious about this at all, since this doesn't look like a very serious submission (against 6.18, etc.), but even if you do that, please ensure that _every_ patch sent to this list is actually addressed for the kernel and using the right paths. >=20 > mt76.h | 1 + > mt7615/main.c | 6 ++-- > mt7615/pci_mac.c | 4 +-- > mt7615/usb.c | 2 +- > mt76_connac_mcu.c | 13 ++++++- > mt76x0/eeprom.c | 2 +- > mt76x02_eeprom.c | 2 +- > mt76x02_usb_core.c | 4 +-- > mt76x2/eeprom.c | 2 +- > mt7921/main.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > mt7925/main.c | 4 +-- > mt792x_core.c | 6 ++-- > 12 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) These are clearly not patches that can be applied to the kernel, and they're erroneously routed to me. johannes