Re: [PATCH] wifi: mac80211: RCU-ify link STA pointers

[Wen Gong <quic_wgong@quicinc.com>]

Please ignore this mail which is not really for patch review.

On 9/12/2022 7:05 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Wen Gong <quic_wgong@quicinc.com> writes:
>
>> On 9/12/2022 6:49 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> Wen Gong <quic_wgong@quicinc.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi Johannes,
>>>>
>>>> Currently for MLO test, the others links's rx_nss of struct
>>>> ieee80211_link_sta is still value 0 in ieee80211_set_associated(),
>>>> becaue they are not pass into ieee80211_sta_set_rx_nss() in
>>>> mac80211 except the deflink which means the primary link.
>>>> This lead driver get nss = 0 for other links. Will you fix it
>>>> or is it design by default?
>>>>
>>>> Only primary link has valid rx_nss value which is not 0 by below call stack.
>>>> ieee80211_assoc_success()->
>>>>       rate_control_rate_init(sta);
>>>>
>>>> commit:c71420db653aba30a234d1e4cf86dde376e604fa
>>>> wifi: mac80211: RCU-ify link STA pointers
>>> Strange format and s-o-b missing. Was this meant as an RFC patch?
>> This is not a patch for review, it is to ask some question about the patch
>>
>> "wifi: mac80211: RCU-ify link STA pointers" which is already upstream.
> Then you should not add "[PATCH]" in the subject. The string "[PATCH]"
> is supposed to inform that the email contains a patch which should be
> applied.
>