Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: Kadir Yavuz Kurt <k.yavuzkurt1@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [BUG] wifi: rtw89: 8922ae: no association until module reload
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 02:46:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c35e169db9404f70b806531180f7ca9d@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103194454.14002-1-k.yavuzkurt1@gmail.com>

Kadir Yavuz Kurt <k.yavuzkurt1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Timing observation (hypothesis, not established)
> ================================================
> 
> The only systematic difference I can see between the failing probe and
> the working one is when it runs relative to Bluetooth initialisation.
> The RTL8922AE is a combo part; the BT function enumerates as USB
> 0bda:8922 and is driven by btusb/btrtl.
> 
> At boot (monotonic timestamps, failing probe):
> 
>     [ 3.018707] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: rom_version status=0 version=1
>     [ 3.018809] rtw89_8922ae 0000:07:00.0: loaded firmware
>                                            rtw89/rtw8922a_fw-4.bin
>     [ 3.018864] rtw89_8922ae 0000:07:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003)
>     [ 3.019712] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: loading rtl_bt/rtl8922au_fw.bin
>     [ 3.052054] rtw89_8922ae 0000:07:00.0: chip info CID: 71, CV: 2, ...
>     [ 3.097814] rtw89_8922ae 0000:07:00.0 wlp7s0: renamed from wlan0
>     [ 3.638714] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: fw version 0x41c0c905
> 
> The entire rtw89 probe (3.018 - 3.098) runs inside the BT firmware
> download (3.019 - 3.639), starting 1 ms after it.

This is a good point. I think you can add rtw89 into blacklist, and
manually load the modules after booting. 

If this works, add a udev rule to delay loading rtw89.

> 
> The working reload, same boot:
> 
>     [53.643379] rtw89_8922ae 0000:07:00.0: loaded firmware
>                                            rtw89/rtw8922a_fw-4.bin
>     [53.675553] rtw89_8922ae 0000:07:00.0: chip info CID: 71, CV: 2, ...
> 
> i.e. 50 s after BT finished initialising.
> 
> I want to be clear that this is only a timing correlation. I have not
> yet tested booting with btusb blacklisted, and I am not claiming the
> two are causally related. It is simply the one difference I could find
> that is present in every failing case and absent in every working one.

RTL8922AE is a WiFi/BT combo card. I think they have interference with
each other when initializing, because they share hardware resource and
race can happen at that time. 

Ping-Ke


      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-11  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-03 19:44 [BUG] wifi: rtw89: 8922ae: no association until module reload Kadir Yavuz Kurt
2026-11-11  2:46 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c35e169db9404f70b806531180f7ca9d@realtek.com \
    --to=pkshih@realtek.com \
    --cc=k.yavuzkurt1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox