From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: Kadir Yavuz Kurt <k.yavuzkurt1@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [BUG] wifi: rtw89: 8922ae: no association until module reload
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 02:46:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c35e169db9404f70b806531180f7ca9d@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103194454.14002-1-k.yavuzkurt1@gmail.com>
Kadir Yavuz Kurt <k.yavuzkurt1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Timing observation (hypothesis, not established)
> ================================================
>
> The only systematic difference I can see between the failing probe and
> the working one is when it runs relative to Bluetooth initialisation.
> The RTL8922AE is a combo part; the BT function enumerates as USB
> 0bda:8922 and is driven by btusb/btrtl.
>
> At boot (monotonic timestamps, failing probe):
>
> [ 3.018707] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: rom_version status=0 version=1
> [ 3.018809] rtw89_8922ae 0000:07:00.0: loaded firmware
> rtw89/rtw8922a_fw-4.bin
> [ 3.018864] rtw89_8922ae 0000:07:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003)
> [ 3.019712] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: loading rtl_bt/rtl8922au_fw.bin
> [ 3.052054] rtw89_8922ae 0000:07:00.0: chip info CID: 71, CV: 2, ...
> [ 3.097814] rtw89_8922ae 0000:07:00.0 wlp7s0: renamed from wlan0
> [ 3.638714] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: fw version 0x41c0c905
>
> The entire rtw89 probe (3.018 - 3.098) runs inside the BT firmware
> download (3.019 - 3.639), starting 1 ms after it.
This is a good point. I think you can add rtw89 into blacklist, and
manually load the modules after booting.
If this works, add a udev rule to delay loading rtw89.
>
> The working reload, same boot:
>
> [53.643379] rtw89_8922ae 0000:07:00.0: loaded firmware
> rtw89/rtw8922a_fw-4.bin
> [53.675553] rtw89_8922ae 0000:07:00.0: chip info CID: 71, CV: 2, ...
>
> i.e. 50 s after BT finished initialising.
>
> I want to be clear that this is only a timing correlation. I have not
> yet tested booting with btusb blacklisted, and I am not claiming the
> two are causally related. It is simply the one difference I could find
> that is present in every failing case and absent in every working one.
RTL8922AE is a WiFi/BT combo card. I think they have interference with
each other when initializing, because they share hardware resource and
race can happen at that time.
Ping-Ke
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 19:44 [BUG] wifi: rtw89: 8922ae: no association until module reload Kadir Yavuz Kurt
2026-11-11 2:46 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c35e169db9404f70b806531180f7ca9d@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=k.yavuzkurt1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox