From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310B4C2BA83 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 11:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1502072D for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 11:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=schafweide.org header.i=@schafweide.org header.b="xCX+/aCI"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=schafweide.org header.i=@schafweide.org header.b="xeXGDGs0" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726111AbgBOLS7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Feb 2020 06:18:59 -0500 Received: from mail.schafweide.org ([185.45.112.52]:39864 "EHLO mail.schafweide.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725977AbgBOLS6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Feb 2020 06:18:58 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 358 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 06:18:58 EST Received: from [IPv6:2a07:59c6:eeff:20:d66:7892:f4ef:c5b1] (unknown [IPv6:2a07:59c6:eeff:20:d66:7892:f4ef:c5b1]) by mail.schafweide.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F40B78340103; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 12:12:58 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=schafweide.org; s=default; t=1581765179; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gvCzgyNYynzhT4qlUIcKQ8MynIRzSIrZhqV2yM/oHck=; b=xCX+/aCIlH443ef8Azz1Aj8qKr96uO6U4OORaASM1a0vBmOFlkWH3ZbieMHMq81v541Di/ tM5K7SWux++dRUCQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=schafweide.org; s=rsa; t=1581765179; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gvCzgyNYynzhT4qlUIcKQ8MynIRzSIrZhqV2yM/oHck=; b=xeXGDGs0Mz+Ixki3UFcW2nVNvfQx24DwwdqiTcqSaVYi/ShI8Uwn9lf2q0Sgy/iIQl5i6V 8PLDjb7BriArqa7k0bQ0AhqROU/crtn4Rx8Dc1MH93zHoDKW42ybxxCRao4HnW86UMnXwX OxkgPTlFFfKnXBek0zyVZ0DR4YkMeBI= Subject: Re: [rtw88] Linux 5.6-rc1 / RTL8822BE WiFi adapter To: Tobias Predel References: <20200214214134.GA12764@t2b3> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: Bjoern Franke Message-ID: Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 12:12:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200214214134.GA12764@t2b3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hi, > Is the provided firmware file in the linux-firmware tree still > compatible with the driver code? > > I would be very glad if someone could look into this. I'm just wondering why these issues do not appear with lwfinger's rtw88 branch[1]. lwfinger mentioned several times that his module is mostly the same as the kernel one. But with the "official" one I often got connection losses or bad throughput. Kind Regards Bjoern [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtlwifi_new-rtw88-dkms/