From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alexander@wetzel-home.de,
johannes.berg@intel.com, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ieee80211_handle_wake_tx_queue and dynamic ps regression
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 14:47:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf5e9339-2511-1135-71da-a8342b264414@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06f76774-1b2e-f563-7128-7d5b9547dfe9@linaro.org>
On 10/01/2023 12:44, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> + linux-wireless
> On 10/01/2023 12:35, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> commit a790cc3a4fad75048295571a350b95b87e022a5a
>> (wake_tx_queue-broken-23-08-01)
>> Author: Alexander Wetzel <alexander@wetzel-home.de>
>> Date: Sun Oct 9 18:30:39 2022 +0200
>>
>> wifi: mac80211: add wake_tx_queue callback to drivers
>>
>> is causing a regression with
>>
>> - CONF_PS = 1
>> - CONF_DYNAMIC_PS = 0
>> - ieee80211_handle_wake_tx_queue
>>
>> In this case we get stuck in a loop similar to this
>>
>> // IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_PS
>> [ 17.255480] wcn36xx: wcn36xx_change_ps/312 enable
>> [ 18.088835] ieee80211_tx_h_dynamic_ps/263 setting
>> IEEE80211_QUEUE_STOP_REASON_PS
>> [ 18.088906] ieee80211_handle_wake_tx_queue/334 entry
>> [ 18.091505] ieee80211_dynamic_ps_disable_work/2250 calling
>> ieee80211_hw_config()
>> [ 18.095370] ieee80211_handle_wake_tx_queue/338 wake_tx_push_queue
>>
>> // IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_PS
>> [ 18.102625] wcn36xx: wcn36xx_change_ps/312 disable
>> [ 18.107643] wake_tx_push_queue/303 entry
>>
>> // txq is stopped here reason == IEEE80211_QUEUE_STOP_REASON_PS
>> [ 18.107654] wake_tx_push_queue/311 q_stopped bitmask 0x00000002
>> IEEE80211_QUEUE_STOP_REASON_PS true
>> [ 18.107661] wake_tx_push_queue/324 exit
>> [ 18.107667] ieee80211_handle_wake_tx_queue/342 exit
>> [ 18.115560] ieee80211_handle_wake_tx_queue/334 entry
>> [ 18.139937] ieee80211_handle_wake_tx_queue/338 wake_tx_push_queue
>> [ 18.145163] wake_tx_push_queue/303 entry
>> [ 18.150016] ieee80211_dynamic_ps_disable_work/2252 completed
>> ieee80211_hw_config()
>>
>> // now we unset IEEE80211_QUEUE_STOP_REASON_PS but too late
>> [ 18.151145] wake_tx_push_queue/311 q_stopped bitmask 0x00000002
>> IEEE80211_QUEUE_STOP_REASON_PS true
>> [ 18.155263] ieee80211_dynamic_ps_disable_work/2254 clearing
>> IEEE80211_QUEUE_STOP_REASON_PS
>> [ 18.162531] wake_tx_push_queue/324 exit
>> [ 18.162548] ieee80211_handle_wake_tx_queue/342 exit
>> [ 18.183639] ieee80211_dynamic_ps_disable_work/2259 cleared
>> IEEE80211_QUEUE_STOP_REASON_PS
>>
>> // IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_PS runs again
>> [ 18.215487] wcn36xx: wcn36xx_change_ps/312 enable
>>
>> We get stuck in that loop. Packets getting transmitted is a rare
>> event, most are dropped.
BTW I considered implementing a wcn36xx specific wake_tx callback -
which maybe should be done anyway.
I _don't_ see other drivers checking for q_stopped &
IEEE80211_QUEUE_STOP_REASON_PS
Should they be ?
If they should check IEEE80211_QUEUE_STOP_REASON_PS, then right now,
they don't. If they shouldn't check IEEE80211_QUEUE_STOP_REASON_PS then
neither should the generic replacement ieee80211_handle_wake_tx_queue()
---
bod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-10 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <19015168-c747-17b7-f0ae-9d2ee27d221c@linaro.org>
2023-01-10 12:44 ` ieee80211_handle_wake_tx_queue and dynamic ps regression Bryan O'Donoghue
2023-01-10 14:47 ` Bryan O'Donoghue [this message]
2023-01-10 15:23 ` Alexander Wetzel
2023-01-10 15:43 ` Alexander Wetzel
2023-01-10 19:35 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2023-01-13 12:17 ` Linux kernel regression tracking (#update)
2023-01-10 16:06 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2023-01-10 13:08 ` Linux kernel regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf5e9339-2511-1135-71da-a8342b264414@linaro.org \
--to=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=alexander@wetzel-home.de \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox