From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: Lewis Robbins <lewis.robbins2@gmail.com>,
"kvalo@kernel.org" <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] wifi: rtw88: reduce failed to flush queue severity
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 02:57:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d03e8c066a6e464aa61badb252c32b01@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240415232837.388945-2-lewis.robbins2@gmail.com>
Lewis Robbins <lewis.robbins2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> writes:
>
> > Lewis Robbins <lewis.robbins2@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Reduce the log message severity when we fail to flush device priority
> >> queue. If a system has a lot of traffic, we may fail to flush the queue
> >> in time. This generates a lot of messages in the kernel ring buffer. As
> >> this is a common occurrence, we should use dev_info instead of dev_warn.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lewis Robbins <lewis.robbins2@gmail.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> >
> > I'd like to know situations of " If a system has a lot of traffic...".
> > Did you scan or do something during traffic?
>
> So, after digging a bit more, it seems you're right this only happens during a
> scan. The log message itself is repeated about 5-10x.
That is the same as my test before.
>
> I'm not sure as to the cause. If the flush operation takes a long time do we
> need to release any mutexes etc? And if this is just a hardware issue, then we
> can do a debug print as you say.
The cause is because packets in hardware TX queue that can't be sent out in time,
and flush ops with 'drop = false', so driver throws one warning. I don't have
good idea for now. Maybe, we can add a special debug mask to replace this kind of
verbose warning with uncertain solution.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-13 22:59 [PATCH] wifi: rtw88: reduce failed to flush queue severity Lewis Robbins
2024-04-15 1:40 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2024-04-15 16:16 ` Kalle Valo
2024-04-15 23:28 ` Lewis Robbins
2024-04-16 2:57 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2024-04-17 1:42 ` Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d03e8c066a6e464aa61badb252c32b01@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=lewis.robbins2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox