From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD4EA1E4AF for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 08:28:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727771301; cv=none; b=GDppdEo2ocqkB0IqXjuTpkFRmJzdDXzeoxGd1lrvk6oIGvBWkYffA4CldEZeh/BiGvI+t3T5yb852oxdJeBSjNwwY8kALu8vXt0gYwP88Jl5ra9S/kVxfSqgVcltPQg6an4emDkGM17KlOcLwnrYdhZeWUl2qVKn3z+4AFhbgt4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727771301; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eWiHPKG7nokALxIXNWo90CDuihS1uRVjJN6sjqrRzx4=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=h8dNfaAxcfcShn63r3rpM3jgiMQaePRhFYG5Wa7iFJQHfPFTnyk19JDzZ733ZsxoAWCcEhFMzUgMICOx1khPDEi82Sptr1ru6EJN58MWmHte6jxYv3X6EkPbhnYNXX/7htT0dC++3dIzm3Wxot7VjA2K5qmHs5NSBQFxrs/c8ZM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=T8ZLj6ya; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="T8ZLj6ya" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=eWiHPKG7nokALxIXNWo90CDuihS1uRVjJN6sjqrRzx4=; t=1727771299; x=1728980899; b=T8ZLj6yanBTZem4/9EiQs0ODU299mYNgpxiV5HFOXM7G0m/ b+OG8JCCRgIqkmBpyrGmE2nhpFLzeGspPs2RSGsfyJoo2V57bRiIZS9X2c2/8jcpxa0nuiTGqAuNn ecNR4wjzrl5Ee2Dt+HxeCvd5FcB+kvtrfkiqx5N76maEra7QI2CQ3wGbT1KWMF0BIS7Ni36Elllb1 RM0rFFuBN7YZa8zD4NVZWxerasYys6EINXWBDXGlkiZ2I+4l64vfrncAlNfMZfEOjTPAltWF1xjsS NaDcMptGzp6kVwxYcM9i3AYg/TSxHZhX2yey6wGIiPAKLUfdiF7gND3U4Rh9Hrow==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1svYEw-0000000Efym-2LfX; Tue, 01 Oct 2024 10:28:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mac80211: fix assigning channel in activate links From: Johannes Berg To: Aditya Kumar Singh Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath12k@lists.infradead.org Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 10:28:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <39b73ddd-5478-4599-a92b-00b274d2ce02@quicinc.com> References: <20241001041518.2236297-1-quic_adisi@quicinc.com> <0353d31db76afbd5d9bb2e7d42246ae3c8e14044.camel@sipsolutions.net> <5fe9fdf2-ae5c-4d15-a095-0203a814e4ba@quicinc.com> <16ad03533ab6aca65c3fe9db94ae53ad11fdb9d1.camel@sipsolutions.net> <39b73ddd-5478-4599-a92b-00b274d2ce02@quicinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.4 (3.52.4-1.fc40) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Tue, 2024-10-01 at 13:56 +0530, Aditya Kumar Singh wrote: > Yes please that would be of great help. Let me send a next version=20 > having the changes as discussed above and then you could pick that for= =20 > testing and let us know whether it is working as expected by Intel driver= ? Sure. I suspect it'll work better if you do the ordering as you had described in the comment. > It would be better if other MLO based drivers could also test this? I=20 > mean if possible they could also test and let us know if this breaks any= =20 > of their expectations! Or if not test, at least ack this change? I guess they'll just have to speak up here too :) johannes