Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Use the QMI service IDs from the QMI header

[Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@oss.qualcomm.com>]

Hi Greg,

On 3/17/26 10:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 3/17/26 01:22, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 18:14:10 +0100 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>> This series is based on the immutable branch [1] containing the QMI
>>>> service id definitions along with some drivers using them.
>>>>
>>>> How a patch can be merged ?
>>>
>>> Wait for the dependency to appear in respective trees after the merge
>>> window then repost the patches individually. I'm starting to get
>>> annoyed with all this cross-tree QMI/MHI noise.
>>
>> An ack is simpler for everyone, especially when they are trivial
> 
> Why isn't this 4 different patches, all for different branches/trees as
> there does not seem to be any dependencies here?
> 
> confused,

The dependency is on the definitions posted in v1 in patch1/8 [1]

The first version of this series was bigger. The definitions were in the 
first patch of the initial series. It has been picked up by Bjorn in the 
corresponding tree along with 4 other patches for subsystems he is in 
charge of and let the other patches left.

He put in place an immutable branch for those who want to pick the 
corresponding patch in their tree [2]

I sent this v2 with a subject prefix fixed and a pointer to the 
immutable branch. So people can just ack the patch or use the branch if 
they want to pick it through their tree.

   -- Daniel

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260309230346.3584252-2-daniel.lezcano@oss.qualcomm.com/

[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/abdkE2qWX5Amf5Jo@baldur/