From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: LB F <goainwo@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [BUG] wifi: rtw88: Hard system freeze on RTL8821CE when power_save is enabled (LPS/ASPM conflict)
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 01:28:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5f00d0a42994812b42df867718fa087@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALdGYqSMUPnPfW-_q1RgYr0_SjoXUejAaJJr-o+jpwCk1S7ndQ@mail.gmail.com>
LB F <goainwo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote:
> > Not sure if this is because PCIE bridge has no ASPM capability?
>
> That could indeed be the case -- I do not have a way to confirm
> without further hardware-level inspection.
>
> > LN5491 (kernel v6.19.6) is:
> > case RX_ENC_VHT:
> > if (WARN_ONCE(status->rate_idx > 11 ||
> > !status->nss ||
> > status->nss > 8,
> > "Rate marked as a VHT rate but data is
> invalid: MCS: %d, NSS: %d\n",
> > status->rate_idx, status->nss))
> > goto drop;
> > break;
> > Looks like driver reports improper VHT nss/rate? But this warns once, and
> > you message isn't like this.
> > Could you check the source code LN5491 you are using?
>
> The file net/mac80211/rx.c is not available on disk on my system
> (CachyOS ships only .h files in the headers package), but I located
> the exact warning message in journalctl:
>
> Rate marked as a VHT rate but data is invalid: MCS: 0, NSS: 0
>
> This confirms that line 5491 in my kernel matches exactly what you
> showed from v6.19.6 -- the RX_ENC_VHT case checking for
> status->nss == 0. The offset in my trace is slightly different
> (+0x183 vs +0x177), which is likely due to CachyOS's LTO/AutoFDO
> compiler optimizations.
>
> The warning appeared once in my initial test session:
>
> Rate marked as a VHT rate but data is invalid: MCS: 0, NSS: 0
> WARNING: net/mac80211/rx.c:5491 at ieee80211_rx_list+0x183/0x1020 [mac80211]
>
> However, in subsequent module reload and reconnect cycles I was unable
> to reproduce it. This is consistent with WARN_ONCE behavior -- it
> likely fired on the first invalid nss=0 packet after the initial
> driver load and has not triggered since. I cannot confirm it as a
> reliable symptom.
To reproduce this reliable, you need to remove driver ko and mac80211.ko,
and reinstall them.
However, you have confirmed this is the symptom. I think only if you
want to dig why the rate reported by hardware is weird, otherwise we
can ignore this warning.
>
> ---
>
> Regarding patch stability: the results below are from testing your
> original RFT patch [1], not any newer submission. I want to be
> explicit to avoid confusion:
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20260311020816.7065-1-pkshih@realtek.
> com/
>
> This is the exact diff I compiled and tested:
>
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> /* Copyright(c) 2018-2019 Realtek Corporation
> */
>
> +#include <linux/dmi.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include "main.h"
> @@ -1744,6 +1745,34 @@ const struct pci_error_handlers rtw_pci_err_handler = {
> };
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtw_pci_err_handler);
>
> +enum rtw88_quirk_dis_pci_caps {
> + QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_ASPM,
> +};
> +
> +static int disable_pci_caps(const struct dmi_system_id *dmi)
> +{
> + uintptr_t dis_caps = (uintptr_t)dmi->driver_data;
> +
> + if (dis_caps & BIT(QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_ASPM))
> + rtw_pci_disable_aspm = true;
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dmi_system_id rtw88_pci_quirks[] = {
> + {
> + .callback = disable_pci_caps,
> + .ident = "HP Notebook - P3S95EA#ACB",
> + .matches = {
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "HP"),
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "HP Notebook"),
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_SKU, "P3S95EA#ACB"),
> + },
> + .driver_data = (void *)BIT(QUIRK_DIS_PCI_CAP_ASPM),
> + },
> + {}
> +};
> +
> int rtw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> const struct pci_device_id *id)
> {
> @@ -1808,6 +1837,7 @@ int rtw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> bridge && bridge->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL)
> rtwpci->rx_no_aspm = true;
>
> + dmi_check_system(rtw88_pci_quirks);
> rtw_pci_phy_cfg(rtwdev);
>
> ret = rtw_register_hw(rtwdev, hw);
>
> Results with only this patch applied:
>
> - The hard freeze lockup is gone.
> - However, during idle the logs are flooded with:
>
> rtw88_8821ce 0000:13:00.0: failed to send h2c command
> rtw88_8821ce 0000:13:00.0: firmware failed to leave lps state
>
> - To give a concrete sense of the volume: over an ~80-minute
> observation window after a clean module reload, I recorded
> 11,757 "failed to send h2c command" events and 2 "firmware
> failed to leave lps state" events -- approximately 110 errors
> per minute during active periods.
> - These errors cause Bluetooth audio stuttering and WiFi
> throughput drops.
>
> When I additionally set disable_lps_deep=Y alongside your ASPM patch,
> all h2c errors vanish completely and Bluetooth/WiFi remain fully
> stable. This confirms that disabling LPS Deep is necessary for
> complete stability on this specific HP SKU.
>
> I also noticed what appears to be a new patch in a separate mailing
> list thread. I will test it shortly and report back with the results.
Thanks for your experiments in detail. :)
Ping-Ke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 21:48 [BUG] wifi: rtw88: Hard system freeze on RTL8821CE when power_save is enabled (LPS/ASPM conflict) LB F
2026-03-10 2:02 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-10 11:01 ` LB F
2026-03-10 15:12 ` LB F
2026-03-11 2:20 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-11 2:15 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-11 2:22 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-11 11:00 ` LB F
2026-03-11 15:22 ` LB F
2026-03-12 1:56 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-12 21:42 ` LB F
2026-03-13 0:03 ` LB F
2026-03-13 0:29 ` LB F
2026-03-14 10:52 ` LB F
2026-03-14 12:39 ` LB F
2026-03-15 0:24 ` LB F
2026-03-16 2:55 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-16 20:27 ` LB F
2026-03-17 1:28 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2026-03-18 0:00 ` LB F
2026-03-18 0:58 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-18 23:55 ` LB F
2026-03-19 0:22 ` LB F
2026-03-19 0:49 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-19 1:24 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-19 23:58 ` LB F
2026-03-20 0:41 ` LB F
2026-03-20 1:00 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-20 1:19 ` LB F
2026-03-20 2:02 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-21 12:07 ` LB F
2026-03-23 2:01 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-25 20:38 ` LB F
2026-03-16 2:50 ` Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e5f00d0a42994812b42df867718fa087@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=goainwo@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox