public inbox for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Ramasamy Kaliappan <ramasamy.kaliappan@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Benjamin Berg <benjamin@sipsolutions.net>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Jouni Malinen <jouni.malinen@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Rameshkumar Sundaram <rameshkumar.sundaram@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Adding NO_STA flag and reworking RX link resolution
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 16:24:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8f6a95273cd9d968883daa010743792b547f2e6.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01295135-6bcf-4567-869b-75597649d11c@oss.qualcomm.com>

On Mon, 2026-04-27 at 15:32 +0530, Ramasamy Kaliappan wrote:
> 
> To simplify this handling, we would like to explore an alternative 
> approach that avoids address translation for management frames 
> (authentication, association, and reassociation),
> regardless of whether the STA already exists.

I'm not convinced that making one specific case a little bit easier is
worth the trade-off for making *all* (other) cases handle link addresses
throughout the entire wifi stack.

> However, this approach may introduce backward compatibility concerns
> when either the driver or hostapd is not updated.
> To address this, we propose introducing a capability indication
> mechanism between the driver and user space (driver ↔ hostapd).

Even assuming we make the (IMHO misleading) effort of not translating
and having it handled throughout the stack, this also can't really work,
unless we suddenly start translating (or not) for each individual
application that may be using action frame registration _separately_.

I don't believe this approach makes more sense than translating and
sorting out the corner cases.

johannes

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-27 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-23 12:38 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Adding NO_STA flag and reworking RX link resolution Benjamin Berg
2026-02-23 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] wifi: iwlwifi: use link_sta internally to the driver Benjamin Berg
2026-02-23 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] wifi: mac80211: change public RX API to use link stations Benjamin Berg
2026-02-24 17:41   ` Ramasamy Kaliappan
2026-02-25  9:19     ` Berg, Benjamin
2026-02-24 18:22   ` Jeff Johnson
2026-02-23 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] wifi: mac80211: refactor RX link_id and station handling Benjamin Berg
2026-02-23 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] wifi: mac80211: rework RX packet handling Benjamin Berg
2026-02-23 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] wifi: cfg80211: add attribute for TX/RX denoting there is no station Benjamin Berg
2026-02-23 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] wifi: mac80211: report to cfg80211 when no STA is known for a frame Benjamin Berg
2026-02-23 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] wifi: mac80211: pass station to ieee80211_tx_skb_tid Benjamin Berg
2026-02-24 17:45   ` Ramasamy Kaliappan
2026-02-25  9:28     ` Benjamin Berg
2026-02-23 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] wifi: mac80211: pass error station if non-STA transmit was requested Benjamin Berg
2026-02-24 17:47   ` Ramasamy Kaliappan
2026-02-25  9:15     ` Benjamin Berg
2026-02-24 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Adding NO_STA flag and reworking RX link resolution Ramasamy Kaliappan
2026-04-27 10:02 ` Ramasamy Kaliappan
2026-04-27 11:13   ` Benjamin Berg
2026-04-27 14:24   ` Johannes Berg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e8f6a95273cd9d968883daa010743792b547f2e6.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=benjamin.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=benjamin@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=jouni.malinen@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ramasamy.kaliappan@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=rameshkumar.sundaram@oss.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox