From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B631C433DB for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 01:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0584E64E0A for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 01:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233727AbhBDBJv (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:09:51 -0500 Received: from mail29.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.29]:44490 "EHLO mail29.static.mailgun.info" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232184AbhBDBJv (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:09:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1612400968; h=Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender; bh=G/wXac09EiUYuMIKbVlza3OTxdoMrvTB/u6MtvKydco=; b=nUC7UJKT1l79JDeG5Fw2wmOFGhVZZPU4EnC86aOMKKug7SABKNb7WL+1jJt5mb+Su3h+eDa0 bQlx+xtO86zD+J+z+uYxaQz+mBkEzF7gUcSZqxvvhHwtXMMXiiysYYwtOQiXaYb7VclFtawR 0YUxeu0K9ursKdTum6PxepuwPbo= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.122.29 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI3YTAwOSIsICJsaW51eC13aXJlbGVzc0B2Z2VyLmtlcm5lbC5vcmciLCAiYmU5ZTRhIl0= Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n02.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 601b491eca5a3268de5bc120 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Thu, 04 Feb 2021 01:08:46 GMT Sender: periyasa=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C5233C43461; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 01:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: periyasa) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DAA0C433CA; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 01:08:46 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 06:38:46 +0530 From: Karthikeyan periyasamy To: Peter Oh Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath11k: Update tx descriptor search index properly In-Reply-To: <08ef5e10-de7a-fe13-d23a-d1afa1dbd0e5@eero.com> References: <1608305041-21946-1-git-send-email-periyasa@codeaurora.org> <959ea12a-e35b-5867-c55e-7f62e2956b09@eero.com> <08ef5e10-de7a-fe13-d23a-d1afa1dbd0e5@eero.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: periyasa@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 2021-02-04 00:59, Peter Oh wrote: > On 1/26/21 6:46 PM, Karthikeyan periyasamy wrote: >> On 2020-12-19 00:53, Peter Oh wrote: >>> On 12/18/20 7:24 AM, Karthikeyan Periyasamy wrote: >>>> Tx descriptor search index field should be updated with hw peer id >>>> and not by AST Hash. Incorrect search index causes throughput >>>> degradation >>>> in all the platforms. so updated the search index field with hw peer >>>> id, >>>> which is a common change applicable for all the platforms. >>>> >>>> Tested-on: IPQ8074 hw2.0 AHB >>>> WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1-01492-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c >>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c >>>> index b69e7eb..f49abefa 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c >>>> >>>> @@ -309,7 +310,11 @@ int ath11k_peer_create(struct ath11k *ar, >>>> struct ath11k_vif *arvif, >>>>         peer->pdev_idx = ar->pdev_idx; >>>>       peer->sta = sta; >>>> -    arvif->ast_hash = peer->ast_hash; >>>> + >>>> +    if (arvif->vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) { >>>> +        arvif->ast_hash = peer->ast_hash; >>>> +        arvif->ast_idx = peer->hw_peer_id; >>>> +    } >>> >>> How about non STATION type? >>> >> >> no need of configuring the ast_idx, ast_hash field for non station >> type. Its recommended by HW/FW team. >> > Can you add this comment in commit message? > sure > Also could you include the answer to "what conditions you observed the > throughput degradation?" in commit message too? In all the scenario will see degradation. Its a general improvement. Regards, Karthikeyan P