From: "Luka Gejak" <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
To: "Ping-Ke Shih" <pkshih@realtek.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rtw-next v2 2/2] wifi: rtw88: sdio: limit the high queue to DTIM delivery
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:30:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea8ee18b36d7416c11ae4f1b4046aed087f87f1c@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea2137c603f146738f8db100e905060a@realtek.com>
October 22, 2026 at 4:24 AM, "Ping-Ke Shih" <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote:
>
> Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> >
> > In AP mode every broadcast and multicast (bmc) frame is sent through the
> > high queue, which the hardware only drains after a DTIM beacon. Only a
> > few frames leave per DTIM, so steady multicast traffic builds a backlog
> > that holds the TX pages the other queues need. Unicast traffic then
> > stalls for seconds and clients can no longer renew their DHCP lease.
> >
> > USB had the same problem and was fixed by commit c710c7c2e038 ("wifi:
> > rtw88: usb: route bmc frames via the high queue only for DTIM delivery")
> > and the two commits that followed it. Use the same rule for SDIO. A bmc
> > frame goes to the high queue only when mac80211 asks for DTIM delivery
> > because a station is dozing, the frame is ARP, EAPOL or DHCP, and the
> > budget allows it. All other bmc frames go out on their access category
> > queue.
> >
> I'd remove second paragraph since it just describes the patch 1/2 does.
>
Would you be willing to drop it your when applying?
Best regards,
Luka Gejak
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 12:43 [PATCH rtw-next v2 1/2] wifi: rtw88: move the bmc high queue decision to tx.c Luka Gejak
2026-10-21 12:43 ` [PATCH rtw-next v2 2/2] wifi: rtw88: sdio: limit the high queue to DTIM delivery Luka Gejak
2026-10-22 2:24 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-10-22 4:30 ` Luka Gejak [this message]
2026-10-22 4:33 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-10-22 2:20 ` [PATCH rtw-next v2 1/2] wifi: rtw88: move the bmc high queue decision to tx.c Ping-Ke Shih
2026-10-22 5:11 ` Luka Gejak
2026-10-23 21:34 ` Luka Gejak
2026-10-25 2:49 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-10-25 8:26 ` Luka Gejak
2026-10-27 1:19 ` Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea8ee18b36d7416c11ae4f1b4046aed087f87f1c@linux.dev \
--to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox