[PATCH rtw-next 1/2] wifi: rtw88: 8822c: Don't process RF path C in query_phy_status_page{0,1}

[Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>]

Replace <= with < in the loops in query_phy_status_page{0,1}(). They
were processing data related to RF path C, which this chip doesn't have.
The only bad effect seems to be that the phy_info file in debugfs was
printing unexpected values for RF path C.

Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c
index 244c8026479c..80c9f0c11e5c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c
@@ -2584,7 +2584,7 @@ static void query_phy_status_page0(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u8 *phy_status,
 	pkt_stat->rx_power[RF_PATH_A] = rx_power[RF_PATH_A];
 	pkt_stat->rx_power[RF_PATH_B] = rx_power[RF_PATH_B];
 
-	for (path = 0; path <= rtwdev->hal.rf_path_num; path++) {
+	for (path = 0; path < rtwdev->hal.rf_path_num; path++) {
 		rssi = rtw_phy_rf_power_2_rssi(&pkt_stat->rx_power[path], 1);
 		dm_info->rssi[path] = rssi;
 	}
@@ -2644,7 +2644,7 @@ static void query_phy_status_page1(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u8 *phy_status,
 	pkt_stat->cfo_tail[RF_PATH_A] = GET_PHY_STAT_P1_CFO_TAIL_A(phy_status);
 	pkt_stat->cfo_tail[RF_PATH_B] = GET_PHY_STAT_P1_CFO_TAIL_B(phy_status);
 
-	for (path = 0; path <= rtwdev->hal.rf_path_num; path++) {
+	for (path = 0; path < rtwdev->hal.rf_path_num; path++) {
 		rssi = rtw_phy_rf_power_2_rssi(&pkt_stat->rx_power[path], 1);
 		dm_info->rssi[path] = rssi;
 		if (path == RF_PATH_A) {
-- 
2.54.0