From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org,
frextrite@gmail.com,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
paulmck@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mac80211: rx.c: Use built-in RCU list checking
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:53:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1913847671d0b7e19aaa9bef1e1eb89febfa942.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200222101831.8001-1-madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com> (sfid-20200222_112140_052707_ACC75C29)
On Sat, 2020-02-22 at 15:48 +0530, madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>
>
> list_for_each_entry_rcu() has built-in RCU and lock checking.
>
> Pass cond argument to list_for_each_entry_rcu() to silence
> false lockdep warning when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST is enabled
> by default.
Umm. What warning?
> +++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c
> @@ -3547,7 +3547,8 @@ static void ieee80211_rx_cooked_monitor(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx,
> skb->pkt_type = PACKET_OTHERHOST;
> skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_802_2);
>
> - list_for_each_entry_rcu(sdata, &local->interfaces, list) {
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(sdata, &local->interfaces, list,
> + lockdep_is_held(&rx->local->rx_path_lock)) {
> if (!ieee80211_sdata_running(sdata))
> continue;
This is not related at all.
> @@ -4114,7 +4115,8 @@ void __ieee80211_check_fast_rx_iface(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata)
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&local->sta_mtx);
>
> - list_for_each_entry_rcu(sta, &local->sta_list, list) {
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(sta, &local->sta_list, list,
> + lockdep_is_held(&local->sta_mtx)) {
And this isn't even a real RCU iteration, since we _must_ hold the mutex
here.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-22 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-22 10:18 [PATCH] net: mac80211: rx.c: Use built-in RCU list checking madhuparnabhowmik10
2020-02-22 12:53 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2020-02-22 13:39 ` Madhuparna Bhowmik
2020-02-22 13:54 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f1913847671d0b7e19aaa9bef1e1eb89febfa942.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=frextrite@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox