public inbox for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net" <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	"s.l-h@gmx.de" <s.l-h@gmx.de>,
	"chewitt@libreelec.tv" <chewitt@libreelec.tv>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] wifi: rtlwifi: Add new rtl8192du driver
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:28:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f19a1e6c-fd56-45b7-9936-a1a72d1988ad@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2280b6c991fa09e66506088441f63790d092e343.camel@realtek.com>

On 19/03/2024 11:18, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-03-17 at 20:44 +0200, Bitterblue Smith wrote:
>>
>> v2:
>>  - Add cover letter.
>>  - Implement feedback.
>>  - Fix more problems reported by checkpatch.
>>  - Split the new driver into several patches (4-12) for easier
>>    reviewing.
>>  - More details about the changes can be found in each patch.
>>
>>
> 
> I have not started reviewing yet, but compiler reports errors/warnings:
> 
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192du/phy.c: In function 'rtl92d_phy_set_poweron':
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192du/phy.c:3055:1: error: expected declaration or 
> statement at end of input
>    3055 | }
>         | ^
>   At top level:
> 

Ahh, that's embarrassing. checkpatch said "else" after "break"
is not useful, so I removed the else. I didn't notice the open
brace after the if... and forgot to compile again before
format-patch. Sorry about that.

> And, sparse/smatch report 
> 

I installed sparse and smatch now.

>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192d/phy_common.h:30:17: warning: 'channel_all' defined
> but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/../rtl8192d/phy_common.h:30:17: warning:
> 'channel_all' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]

I see now that channel_all is only used in phy_common.c.
I will move it there.

>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192d/phy_common.h:60:39: warning: context imbalance in
> 'rtl92d_bandtype_2_4G' - unexpected unlock
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192d/phy_common.h:60:39: warning: context imbalance in
> 'rtl92d_dm_false_alarm_counter_statistics' - unexpected unlock
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192d/phy_common.h:60:39: warning: context imbalance in
> 'rtl92d_dm_cck_packet_detection_thresh' - unexpected unlock

These look like false positives. Every unlock is preceded by
a lock. I found a suggestion to annotate the functions with
"__acquires(...)" and "__releases(...)" to quiet these warnings,
but that didn't do anything. I can only fix it by copying the
contents of rtl92d_acquire_cckandrw_pagea_ctl() and
rtl92d_release_cckandrw_pagea_ctl() to the eight places where
they are called, and duplicating the code that needs locking:

	if (rtlpriv->rtlhal.interfaceindex == 1 &&
	    rtlpriv->rtlhal.interface == INTF_PCI) {
		spin_lock_irqsave(&rtlpriv->locks.cck_and_rw_pagea_lock, flag);
		temp_cck = rtl_get_bbreg(hw, RCCK0_TXFILTER2,
					 MASKDWORD) & MASKCCK;
		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtlpriv->locks.cck_and_rw_pagea_lock, flag);
	} else {
		temp_cck = rtl_get_bbreg(hw, RCCK0_TXFILTER2,
					 MASKDWORD) & MASKCCK;
	}

>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/../rtl8192d/phy_common.h:30:17: warning:
> 'channel_all' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192du/../rtl8192d/phy_common.h:30:17: warning:
> 'channel_all' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192d/phy_common.h:30:17: warning: 'channel_all' defined
> but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/../rtl8192d/phy_common.h:30:17: warning:
> 'channel_all' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/../rtl8192d/phy_common.h:60:39: warning: context
> imbalance in 'rtl92d_phy_set_bw_mode' - unexpected unlock
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/../rtl8192d/phy_common.h:60:39: warning: context
> imbalance in '_rtl92d_phy_reload_imr_setting' - unexpected unlock
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/../rtl8192d/phy_common.h:60:39: warning: context
> imbalance in 'rtl92d_phy_iq_calibrate' - unexpected unlock
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192du/../rtl8192d/phy_common.h:30:17: warning:
> 'channel_all' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/../rtl8192d/phy_common.h:30:17: warning:
> 'channel_all' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/../rtl8192d/phy_common.h:30:17: warning:
> 'channel_all' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]

>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192d/phy_common.c:91:16: warning: context imbalance in
> 'rtl92d_phy_query_rf_reg' - different lock contexts for basic block
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192d/phy_common.c:98:6: warning: context imbalance in
> 'rtl92d_phy_set_rf_reg' - different lock contexts for basic block

This looks like sparse is getting confused. I fixed it
by putting both lock and unlock inside the same if,
like above.

>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192d/rf_common.c:8:6: warning: no previous prototype for
> 'rtl92d_phy_rf6052_set_bandwidth' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192d/rf_common.c:46:6: warning: no previous prototype for
> 'rtl92d_phy_rf6052_set_cck_txpower' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192d/rf_common.c:362:6: warning: no previous prototype
> for 'rtl92d_phy_rf6052_set_ofdm_txpower' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

It was missing #include "rf_common.h".

>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192du/phy.c:3055:1: error: expected declaration or
> statement at end of input
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192du/phy.c:2957:6: warning: 'rtl92du_phy_init_pa_bias'
> defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192du/phy.c:2923:6: warning: 'rtl92d_phy_check_poweroff'
> defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192du/phy.c:2694:6: warning:
> 'rtl92d_update_bbrf_configuration' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]

These warnings seem to be caused by that stray open brace I mentioned.

>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192du/../rtl8192d/phy_common.h:30:17: warning:
> 'channel_all' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192d/rf_common.c:8:6: warning: symbol
> 'rtl92d_phy_rf6052_set_bandwidth' was not declared. Should it be static?
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192d/rf_common.c:46:6: warning: symbol
> 'rtl92d_phy_rf6052_set_cck_txpower' was not declared. Should it be static?
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192d/rf_common.c:362:6: warning: symbol
> 'rtl92d_phy_rf6052_set_ofdm_txpower' was not declared. Should it be static?
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/../rtl8192d/phy_common.h:30:17: warning:
> 'channel_all' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
> 
> Please correct them. I will wait for your v3. 
> 
> Ping-Ke 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-19 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-17 18:44 [PATCH v2 00/12] wifi: rtlwifi: Add new rtl8192du driver Bitterblue Smith
2024-03-17 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] wifi: rtlwifi: rtl8192de: Fix 5 GHz TX power Bitterblue Smith
2024-03-17 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] wifi: rtlwifi: Move code from rtl8192de to rtl8192d-common Bitterblue Smith
2024-03-17 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] wifi: rtlwifi: Adjust rtl8192d-common for USB Bitterblue Smith
2024-03-17 18:48 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] wifi: rtlwifi: Add rtl8192du/table.{c,h} Bitterblue Smith
2024-03-17 18:49 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] wifi: rtlwifi: Add rtl8192du/hw.{c,h} Bitterblue Smith
2024-03-17 18:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] wifi: rtlwifi: Add rtl8192du/phy.{c,h} Bitterblue Smith
2024-03-17 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] wifi: rtlwifi: Add rtl8192du/trx.{c,h} Bitterblue Smith
2024-03-17 18:52 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] wifi: rtlwifi: Add rtl8192du/rf.{c,h} Bitterblue Smith
2024-03-17 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] wifi: rtlwifi: Add rtl8192du/fw.{c,h} and rtl8192du/led.{c,h} Bitterblue Smith
2024-03-17 18:54 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] wifi: rtlwifi: Add rtl8192du/dm.{c,h} Bitterblue Smith
2024-03-17 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] wifi: rtlwifi: Add rtl8192du/sw.{c,h} Bitterblue Smith
2024-03-19  8:08   ` Zenm Chen
2024-03-19 16:38     ` Bitterblue Smith
2024-03-17 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] wifi: rtlwifi: Enable the new rtl8192du driver Bitterblue Smith
2024-03-19  9:18 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] wifi: rtlwifi: Add " Ping-Ke Shih
2024-03-19 16:28   ` Bitterblue Smith [this message]
2024-03-20  0:57     ` Ping-Ke Shih
2024-03-20 13:57       ` Bitterblue Smith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f19a1e6c-fd56-45b7-9936-a1a72d1988ad@gmail.com \
    --to=rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=chewitt@libreelec.tv \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
    --cc=s.l-h@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox