From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2155938E5E1 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2026 11:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772625034; cv=none; b=tdTqrGN6JWkEYR671M92ZmWRUH1rkT4kAkObZYXJm8+4RIx2UFdVd14kgPAQToXWYNnWKANXVvognRXs+Aiwb2+VGx3QSIvyggypUyEvuuylOVb78K4HMdFVaOJlVq8zCd1yK1hduNGoNebfPY+pGu3Xa8Ae7cXTOVVnVy+wQAs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772625034; c=relaxed/simple; bh=q3DE9vOaigtLlKcc8sXzmDpVlqEHispVyAKDPoS9y6M=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=NkwcGe5MVUpIO+Up6JD1X1wsHDWalbpWu66dcZgpyOo8xs1TPjDwHI8KD2JUa32Th51xb8gD9Mq85lGTnV5gOsWHLwL6Csf9JUwUuCr9FzwqfJlW0vEpblVCiGVGZo7GhUAkplUbwTOEiVb7ZEd4f3c9L6P8Jj6H5GvWVJma+9A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=PfiOFsh9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="PfiOFsh9" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=K+zssNMV9q796HtRGvKwy0H4kjtVUKNsqnthZZzxWg8=; t=1772625033; x=1773834633; b=PfiOFsh93Tl8pK7Dw9GTBNw268wH/jFxMqAQLF8UvyUBsR4 d0XBhleoo06CwdzvYhdjnGmCYMqdpeWuIeEa/JnfhUBZZVGggeuBlv1ieIZUovR82eI23AiT6ymlV pTW6SfjaH2EzDrkj1vovt9ctafRApdz+e7DaxrcdwP8fvev4zQsTf7Enq2PwgSBloAoDmi8qqQK/L Gbjsah/GVmQfNkwBkXuk7MP0Hh39OOlsyStuTHyzJVblg9Pie4YHBcAsnWLX9Pb/+36w3t1CUXrqt +ARgikvwu9JxXixC5/fddvnrzl70aqremeGz4i0qgE9rkCxGajMt8MgNb8qpzxXA==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vxkkH-000000083V1-1lA0; Wed, 04 Mar 2026 12:50:29 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-next v2 06/16] wifi: cfg80211: add proximity detection capabilities to PMSR From: Johannes Berg To: Peddolla Harshavardhan Reddy Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kavita.kavita@oss.qualcomm.com Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 12:50:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20260304071538.3833062-7-peddolla.reddy@oss.qualcomm.com> References: <20260304071538.3833062-1-peddolla.reddy@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260304071538.3833062-7-peddolla.reddy@oss.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.58.3 (3.58.3-1.fc43) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Wed, 2026-03-04 at 12:45 +0530, Peddolla Harshavardhan Reddy wrote: >=20 > +++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c > @@ -404,6 +404,10 @@ nl80211_pmsr_attr_policy[NL80211_PMSR_ATTR_MAX + 1] = =3D { > [NL80211_PMSR_ATTR_TYPE_CAPA] =3D { .type =3D NLA_REJECT }, > [NL80211_PMSR_ATTR_PEERS] =3D > NLA_POLICY_NESTED_ARRAY(nl80211_pmsr_peer_attr_policy), > + [NL80211_PMSR_ATTR_PD_SUPPORT] =3D { .type =3D NLA_REJECT }, > + [NL80211_PMSR_ATTR_PD_CONCURRENT_ISTA_RSTA_SUPPORT] =3D { > + .type =3D NLA_REJECT > + }, Probably should use something like the global policy, with [0] =3D { .strict_start_type =3D NL80211_PMSR_ATTR_PD_SUPPORT }, instead of listing them? That way, unlisted ones become reject automatically, I think. It's been a while ... johannes