From: merez@codeaurora.org
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "Haim, Maya" <merez@qti.qualcomm.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
qca_merez <qca_merez@qca.qualcomm.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
wil6210 <wil6210@qca.qualcomm.com>,
linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] wil6210: add function name to wil log macros
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:08:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f30cd2af1235f2ec95bbefe22c7639f8@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8760vjqco7.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
:כתב Kalle Valo, 2016-04-15 15:28 בתאריך
> "Haim, Maya" <merez@qti.qualcomm.com> writes:
>
>> On 4/7/2016 6:41 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> "Haim, Maya" <merez@qti.qualcomm.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 4/6/2016 10:19 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 14:24 +0300, Maya Erez wrote:
>>>>>> Add __func__ to all wil log macros for easier debugging.
>>>>> I think this is unnecessary and merely bloats code size.
>>>>> For all the _dbg calls, dynamic debug can add function names if
>>>>> desired.
>>>>>
>>>>> If really desired, I suggest changing the logging functions to use
>>>>> "%ps and __builtin_return_address(0)
>>>> I implemented it with __builtin_return_address(0) at first but found
>>>> its format less readable (e.g. wil_start_xmit+0x58/0x7e8).
>>> Will that work with inline functions and with functions which the
>>> compiler has optimised out?
>>
>> That's a good point. I did a quick check and it doesn't work for
>> inline or static functions - for such functions, the name of the
>> calling function is printed.
>
> Thanks for checking.
>
>> We can either (1) use my initial implementation (2) add __func__ only
>> to the wil_dbg_... macros or (3) revert this patch completely. I find
>> the addition of the function names very useful and since most of the
>> code doesn't include it, it makes the analysis of issues less
>> efficient. Kalle - what is your say on that?
>
> I don't have any preference, it's up to you what you like most.
>
> One more possibility: in ath10k we have a kconfig option
> CONFIG_ATH10K_DEBUG to make it possible to disable all overhead from
> debug functionality, that would at least solve Joe's concern of extra
> memory usage.
I looked a bit more on the different options.
For the dbg functions, the function name can be added as part of the
dynamic debug options (as mentioned by Joe). Therefore I will remove
the addition of __func__ from those macros.
The dynamic debug also guarantees zero overhead so I don't see the need
for an additional debug config flag (such as CONFIG_ATH10K_DEBUG).
As for wil_err and wil_info, I believe we can add the __func__ to them,
as wil_info is not commonly used in our code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-05 11:24 [PATCH 0/7] wil6210 patches Maya Erez
2016-04-05 11:24 ` [PATCH 1/7] wil6210: add function name to wil log macros Maya Erez
2016-04-06 7:19 ` Joe Perches
2016-04-07 15:04 ` Haim, Maya
2016-04-07 15:41 ` Kalle Valo
2016-04-12 7:45 ` Haim, Maya
2016-04-15 12:28 ` Kalle Valo
2016-04-25 9:08 ` merez [this message]
2016-04-07 16:05 ` Joe Perches
2016-04-05 11:24 ` [PATCH 2/7] wil6210: support regular scan on P2P_DEVICE interface Maya Erez
2016-04-05 11:24 ` [PATCH 3/7] wil6210: change RX_HTRSH interrupt print level to debug Maya Erez
2016-04-05 11:24 ` [PATCH 4/7] wil6210: print debug message when transmitting while disconnected Maya Erez
2016-04-06 7:22 ` Joe Perches
2016-04-10 19:17 ` qca_merez
2016-04-11 2:30 ` Joe Perches
2016-04-25 13:30 ` merez
2016-04-05 11:24 ` [PATCH 5/7] wil6210: unmask RX_HTRSH interrupt only when connected Maya Erez
2016-04-05 11:24 ` [PATCH 6/7] wil6210: prevent deep sleep of 60G device in critical paths Maya Erez
2016-04-05 11:24 ` [PATCH 7/7] wil6210: add support for device led configuration Maya Erez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f30cd2af1235f2ec95bbefe22c7639f8@codeaurora.org \
--to=merez@codeaurora.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=merez@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=qca_merez@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=wil6210@qca.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).