From: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@marvell.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Problems with mwifiex_pcie firmware activation
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 07:17:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc70c75bfcab4e0e932274034b5b4493@SC-EXCH04.marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160811122917.GB27059@redhat.com>
Hi Stanislaw,
> From: Stanislaw Gruszka [mailto:sgruszka@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 5:59 PM
> To: Amitkumar Karwar
> Cc: Nishant Sarmukadam; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Problems with mwifiex_pcie firmware activation
>
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:21:58AM +0000, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Stanislaw Gruszka [mailto:sgruszka@redhat.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > To: Amitkumar Karwar
> > > Cc: Nishant Sarmukadam; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: Problems with mwifiex_pcie firmware activation
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 02:09:52PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 01:53:15PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 01:47:53PM +0000, Amitkumar Karwar
> wrote:
> > > > > > Could you please share complete dmesg log for failure and
> > > successful cases?
> > > > >
> > > > > Dmesg from failure case is in attachment. I loose access to
> > > > > system where device initalize, I'll provide missed dmesg when I
> > > > > get back the access.
> > > >
> > > > Have the access now, dmesg is in attachment.
> > >
> > > Any news here ?
> >
> > Do you have below patch included? It increases poll count which may
> help in your case.
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7973951/
>
> Yes, I have that patch.
>
> To clarify the issue: reverting above patch seems to helps with the
> problem. That what I basically did on first of my systems with mwifiex,
> that did not work similarly like second one. However I did not revert
> the patch but just comment out check_winner_status:
>
> @@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ int mwifiex_dnld_fw(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter,
> }
>
> /* check if we are the winner for downloading FW */
> - if (adapter->if_ops.check_winner_status) {
> + if (false) {
> adapter->winner = 0;
> ret = adapter->if_ops.check_winner_status(adapter);
>
> After running modified kernel once, the problem was gone on unmodified
> kernel! I suppose that once new firmware was uploaded to the device it
> somehow modify it (change it's internal firmware?) and make
> check_winner_status() works correctly. This is strange, but I can not
> find any other explanation and don't see any other changes in the first
> system that makes mwifiex suddenly work.
>
> I could be wrong, but I suppose somebody who use pre 4.6 kernel (without
> the above patch committed as: 2fd5c6ed0b4fbf3c2d9314a24c82862ce5254d42
> "mwifiex: firmware download enhancements") with new enough mwifiex
> firmware, will not see the problem even after kernel update. But if
> somebody install 4.6 or newer kernel on pristine hardware, the device
> will not work.
>
The problem looks strange. The patch just splits mwifiex_check_fw_status() and increases poll count. It should not have any side-effects.
Our code used to check winner status before this patch also.
Regards,
Amitkumar Karwar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-12 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-14 13:50 Problems with mwifiex_pcie firmware activation Stanislaw Gruszka
2016-06-14 14:12 ` Kalle Valo
2016-06-15 7:48 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2016-06-15 13:47 ` Amitkumar Karwar
2016-06-16 11:53 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2016-06-23 12:09 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2016-08-11 9:01 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2016-08-11 10:21 ` Amitkumar Karwar
2016-08-11 12:29 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2016-08-12 7:17 ` Amitkumar Karwar [this message]
2016-08-12 8:13 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2016-08-25 15:06 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2016-11-14 10:15 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2016-11-16 6:03 ` Amitkumar Karwar
2016-11-21 12:20 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc70c75bfcab4e0e932274034b5b4493@SC-EXCH04.marvell.com \
--to=akarwar@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nishants@marvell.com \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).