From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE33B14B095; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 09:06:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721811999; cv=none; b=a+8h3u+twFmmpD0YfHfI997oWITJwslP3GbcUvOu7o5x0Rwf9iuOk4xEx8R+9zuJU3uGCwhO4KkKvkh34Tn3fwP4HERb3F5F63/ZOnh1+FEGov7fec93626xYsUpGw8Ze5pZZAD9g2DUzFmRpSSNTa0wg4GO/0Wi/ktKQDjioqw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721811999; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QrFxDcN4n10oTiBQIOKDoz81+N9yJcI+JrDQSMc3bAM=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=nV4P/GIdePYC4yuFPPYizLVZzkXcFNHFGS0snjOAdPA0DDWUBrZOGQV5bZQbryO/dYo68dgFmLlK3BGQf5z8L1+eBUcl/GQ+n7aO13Jf8Ev2gnouPMzFP2T5X6B+zOQsH15oQjPpODdT+uNZbyDytrX/dngJZ/uPluoBpO+5vIY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=BMmLNSgW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="BMmLNSgW" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=QrFxDcN4n10oTiBQIOKDoz81+N9yJcI+JrDQSMc3bAM=; t=1721811997; x=1723021597; b=BMmLNSgWERq2pGvna94KZn8L9anOvRlRJCqcTE0pO2m3pc/ Dp6sE6aWlfPFWrnSkAMrvRLxAJh5h2300EtSG/U3US2KvX5vYK5aVdc2PzUuF6A6BKI9esYvYZDYq FB3mTL1K9OmAxBTYlhw66UISnOjXC3J/uUjX9/5acydULb3EQ5Bta3j0UO7qM51I4IrW0RzLZ8B5v VWlBkjp6D1HisQmi/IH8dLzKNrSLpwFAW0aeC4FoC6U1Lbv5xCOIllUGfTSHr5wDMg4q7WojnaQmu XwnO2uLlSYFc3PTTfuVB/D2IzI6QyG+ICckkOWS16/15PMwVkeY00pzfN/BEfo3w==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1sWXxC-0000000DL4k-0XoI; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 11:06:34 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: add macro_checker script to check unused parameters in macros From: Johannes Berg To: Andrew Morton , Julian Sun Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, masahiroy@kernel.org, n.schier@avm.de, ojeda@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, kvalo@kernel.org Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 11:06:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20240723150931.42f206f9cd86bc391b48c790@linux-foundation.org> References: <20240723091154.52458-1-sunjunchao2870@gmail.com> <20240723150931.42f206f9cd86bc391b48c790@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.3 (3.52.3-1.fc40) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned >=20 > Makes me wonder who will run this, and why. I suspect once it's there we could convince folks like the 0-day robot maintainers or Jakub for nipa [1] to run it and at least flag newly reported issues. [1] https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa Or maybe run it with W=3D1 like we run kernel-doc then (cmd_checkdoc and "$(call cmd,checkdoc)")? johannes