linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com>
To: Peter Oh <peter.oh@bowerswilkins.com>,
	"kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: "yiboz@codeaurora.org" <yiboz@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: remove iteration in wake_tx_queue
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 08:47:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd76296d-e88e-1dbd-b3d2-e9e7edc7f49d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba7a88e5-10ff-2ec2-feee-6d4adf472833@bowerswilkins.com>



On 3/27/19 6:49 PM, Peter Oh wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/27/2019 09:29 AM, Erik Stromdahl wrote:
>> Iterating the TX queue and thereby dequeuing all available packets in the
>> queue could result in performance penalties on some SMP systems.
>>
> Please share the test results and numbers you've run to help others
> thoughts.
> 

I haven't run any tests with ath10k PCIe, but Yibo Zhao had noticed a 10%
degradation without this patch.

Yibo:
Can you provide iperf results etc. that shows the performance gain?

--
Erik

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-29  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-27 16:29 [PATCH] ath10k: remove iteration in wake_tx_queue Erik Stromdahl
2019-03-27 17:49 ` Peter Oh
2019-03-29  7:47   ` Erik Stromdahl [this message]
2019-04-01 12:17     ` Yibo Zhao
2019-04-01 11:05 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-16 18:54   ` Erik Stromdahl
2019-04-16 19:07     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-04-17 13:29       ` Erik Stromdahl
2019-04-26  7:07         ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-25  5:41 ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fd76296d-e88e-1dbd-b3d2-e9e7edc7f49d@gmail.com \
    --to=erik.stromdahl@gmail.com \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.oh@bowerswilkins.com \
    --cc=yiboz@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).