From: pradeepc@codeaurora.org
To: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@openmesh.com>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k:add support for multicast rate control
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 22:10:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe1af65b1042bc3c2b551dcbe7d53f3c@codeaurora.org> (raw)
On 2018-04-12 01:00, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 11. April 2018 21:04:46 CEST Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu wrote:
>> Issues wmi command to firmware when multicast rate change is received
>> with the new BSS_CHANGED_MCAST_RATE flag.
> [...]
>>
>> + if (changed & BSS_CHANGED_MCAST_RATE &&
>> + !WARN_ON(ath10k_mac_vif_chan(arvif->vif, &def))) {
>> + band = def.chan->band;
>> + sband = &ar->mac.sbands[band];
>> + vdev_param = ar->wmi.vdev_param->mcast_data_rate;
>> + rate_index = vif->bss_conf.mcast_rate[band] - 1;
>> + rate = ATH10K_HW_MCS_RATE(sband->bitrates[rate_index].hw_value);
>> + ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_MAC,
>> + "mac vdev %d mcast_rate %d\n",
>> + arvif->vdev_id, rate);
>> +
>> + ret = ath10k_wmi_vdev_set_param(ar, arvif->vdev_id,
>> + vdev_param, rate);
>> + if (ret)
>> + ath10k_warn(ar,
>> + "failed to set mcast rate on vdev"
>> + " %i: %d\n", arvif->vdev_id, ret);
>> + }
>> +
>> mutex_unlock(&ar->conf_mutex);
>> }
>>
>>
>
> I see two major problems here without checking the actual
> implementation
> details:
>
> * hw_value is incorrect for a couple of devices. Some devices use a
> different
> mapping when they receive rates inforamtion (hw_value) then the ones
> you use
> for the mcast/bcast/beacon rate setting. I've handled in my POC patch
> like
> this:
>
> + if (ath10k_mac_bitrate_is_cck(sband->bitrates[i].bitrate)) {
> + preamble = WMI_RATE_PREAMBLE_CCK;
> +
> + /* QCA didn't use the correct rate values for CA99x0
> + * and above (ath10k_g_rates_rev2)
> + */
> + switch (sband->bitrates[i].bitrate) {
> + case 10:
> + hw_value = ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_LP_1M;
> + break;
> + case 20:
> + hw_value = ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_LP_2M;
> + break;
> + case 55:
> + hw_value = ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_LP_5_5M;
> + break;
> + case 110:
> + hw_value = ATH10K_HW_RATE_CCK_LP_11M;
> + break;
> + }
> + } else {
> + preamble = WMI_RATE_PREAMBLE_OFDM;
> + }
>
Isn't this already fixed in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9150145/
?
> * bcast + mcast (+ mgmt) have to be set separately
Can you please let me know why this would be necessary?
Although I see minstrel rate control is currently seems using the
mcast_rate
setting to set MGMT/BCAST/MCAST rates, will this not be misleading to
user
passed value with 'iw set mcast_rate' for MGMT traffic as well?
>
> I have attached my POC patch (which I was using for packet loss based
> mesh
> metrics) and to work around (using debugfs) the silly mgmt vs.
> mcast/bcast
> settings of the QCA fw for APs.
>
> Many of the information came from Ben Greears ath10k-ct driver
> https://github.com/greearb/ath10k-ct
>
> Kind regards,
> Sven
next reply other threads:[~2018-04-17 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-17 5:10 pradeepc [this message]
2018-04-17 6:33 ` [PATCH] ath10k:add support for multicast rate control Sven Eckelmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-12 4:04 Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu
2018-04-12 8:00 ` Sven Eckelmann
2020-12-21 17:23 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe1af65b1042bc3c2b551dcbe7d53f3c@codeaurora.org \
--to=pradeepc@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sven.eckelmann@openmesh.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).