From: "Thomas Bächler" <thomas@archlinux.org>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] iwl3945: Disabled channels
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:38:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fuiccr$keo$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <480C5AFF.5020005@fenrir.org.uk>
Brian Morrison schrieb:
> options cfg80211 ieee80211_regdom="JP"
Band 1:
Frequencies:
* 2412 MHz
* 2417 MHz
* 2422 MHz
* 2427 MHz
* 2432 MHz
* 2437 MHz
* 2442 MHz
* 2447 MHz
* 2452 MHz
* 2457 MHz
* 2462 MHz
* 2467 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS)
* 2472 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS)
Bitrates:
* 1.0 Mbps
* 2.0 Mbps (short preamble supported)
* 5.5 Mbps (short preamble supported)
* 11.0 Mbps (short preamble supported)
* 6.0 Mbps
* 9.0 Mbps
* 12.0 Mbps
* 18.0 Mbps
* 24.0 Mbps
* 36.0 Mbps
* 48.0 Mbps
* 54.0 Mbps
Band 2:
Frequencies:
* 5170 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS)
* 5180 MHz
* 5190 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS)
* 5200 MHz
* 5210 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS)
* 5220 MHz
* 5230 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS)
* 5240 MHz
* 5260 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5280 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5300 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5320 MHz (passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5500 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5520 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5540 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5560 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5580 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5600 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5620 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5640 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5660 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5680 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
* 5700 MHz (disabled, passive scanning, no IBSS, radar detection)
Bitrates:
* 6.0 Mbps
* 9.0 Mbps
* 12.0 Mbps
* 18.0 Mbps
* 24.0 Mbps
* 36.0 Mbps
* 48.0 Mbps
* 54.0 Mbps
This look better, although I have to wait until tomorrow to see if the
Access Point in question uses one of the now enabled 11a channels.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-21 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fuhkfp$mnk$1@ger.gmane.org>
2008-04-21 9:14 ` [ipw3945-devel] iwl3945: Disabled channels Brian Morrison
2008-04-21 13:50 ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-21 14:19 ` Brian Morrison
2008-04-21 14:41 ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-21 15:01 ` Brian Morrison
2008-04-21 15:12 ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-21 15:36 ` Brian Morrison
2008-04-21 14:28 ` Brian Morrison
2008-04-21 15:38 ` Thomas Bächler [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='fuiccr$keo$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=thomas@archlinux.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).