From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:42163 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750947AbYEQPoW (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2008 11:44:22 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JxOa4-0006L2-Ne for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 17 May 2008 15:44:20 +0000 Received: from cpc1-cwma5-0-0-cust137.swan.cable.ntl.com ([80.4.12.138]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 17 May 2008 15:44:20 +0000 Received: from sitsofe by cpc1-cwma5-0-0-cust137.swan.cable.ntl.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 17 May 2008 15:44:20 +0000 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: Sitsofe Wheeler Subject: Re: rt61pci breaks after hibernate Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 15:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: (sfid-20080517_174429_393319_2866052B) References: <200805171651.56973.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 17 May 2008 16:51:56 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Is this a regression or did it work before? Um... It is a regression and it worked before? It worked in 2.6.25 but was broken in linux-next-20081513 . -- Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/