From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:38551 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752418AbXDHDAK (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Apr 2007 23:00:10 -0400 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HaNdK-0007sK-9C for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2007 05:00:03 +0200 Received: from pool-71-110-62-245.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net ([71.110.62.245]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Apr 2007 05:00:02 +0200 Received: from macorgan by pool-71-110-62-245.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Apr 2007 05:00:02 +0200 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: mike Subject: GLP code in BSD tree Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 02:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: How in the hell can you possibly call direct cut-and-paste a mistake? Grow up, and admit the theft ("mistaken misuse") of the code in question! If it was my code, I doubt I would ask privately and politely how it was cut and pasted into the BSD source tree.