From: Adam Baker <linux@baker-net.org.uk>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: enable IBSS merging
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:16:58 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20080122T230306-543@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200801222054.23433.IvDoorn@gmail.com
Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > > > Then there is a problem for rt2x00. Since the mactime isn't known.
> > > > > rt2400pci is the _only_ device which has a RX_END_TIME field in the
> > > > > RX descriptor.
> > > >
> > > > one workaround could be to simply use the current TSF at the time in
> > > > the tasklet or interrupt handler (to be more close to the actual rx
> > > > time). this should be sufficient to catch most cases where an IBSS
> > > > merge is necessary - usually the beacon's TSF will be much higher
> > > > than the local TSF.
> > >
> > > Should the driver to this, or should mac80211 handle that?
> >
> > The driver should if it has access to some the mactime of the received
> > packet otherwise yes -- I think mac80211 can handle this using the
> > supplied get_tsf().
> >
> > > Personally I think it is something for the mac80211 layer since the
> > > driver will give what it can, and can be sure that it is what mac80211
> > > expects instead of drivers interpreting what mac80211 might want as
> > > replacement. If mac80211 needs the TSF value when no mac time is
> > > given, it could just use the get_tsf() callback function to the driver
> > > to get the substitute. When the get_tsf() callback is not provided,
> > > then mac80211 can complain about missing information.
> >
>
I see one problem with this. At the moment rt2x00 doesn't implement get_tsf
for USB devices. In the case of RT73 this is because mac80211 requires
get_tsf to be atomic which precludes waiting for a USB device to reply
to a request. Ivo has got an implementation in the code but it is disabled
as the fact it sleeps was causing bugs. Presumably other USB devices would
have the same problem.
I'm not sure if the code path for IBSS merging would require an atomic
version, I'm guessing it wouldn't. If so do we need to consider whether
to either have both get_tsf and get_tsf_atomic or have a flag to get_tsf
indicating if it can sleep if it needs to?
Adam Baker
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-22 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-18 12:52 [PATCH] mac80211: enable IBSS merging Bruno Randolf
2008-01-20 10:17 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-20 10:43 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-21 1:52 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-21 16:05 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-22 19:47 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-22 19:54 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-22 20:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-22 20:51 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-23 1:59 ` [ath5k-devel] " bruno randolf
2008-01-22 23:16 ` Adam Baker [this message]
2008-01-22 23:25 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-23 14:49 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-24 5:51 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-21 1:57 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-23 14:48 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-23 17:22 ` Dan Williams
2008-01-24 3:49 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-24 3:26 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-24 16:55 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-25 8:01 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-02 23:22 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-05 1:50 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-05 1:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-06 10:01 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-06 4:34 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-02-06 18:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-06 20:10 ` John W. Linville
2008-02-07 3:58 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-02-08 9:22 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-12 2:00 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-15 1:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-15 1:40 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-07 3:52 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-02-08 9:10 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-24 5:43 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-24 8:51 ` Kalle Valo
2008-01-24 14:27 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-24 14:30 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-25 6:16 ` bruno randolf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-05 11:08 [PATCH 2/2] " Johannes Berg
2008-02-06 2:49 ` [PATCH] " Bruno Randolf
2008-02-06 23:52 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-08 9:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-12 3:25 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-12 9:50 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-14 6:19 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-14 14:12 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-12 9:52 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-14 10:19 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-08 9:41 Joerg Pommnitz
2008-02-15 15:09 [PATCH 3/3] " Johannes Berg
2008-02-16 2:29 ` [PATCH] " Bruno Randolf
2008-02-17 9:11 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-18 1:42 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-18 11:15 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-18 2:03 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-18 11:16 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20080122T230306-543@post.gmane.org \
--to=linux@baker-net.org.uk \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).