From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:51621 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755349AbYEVRuJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 13:50:09 -0400 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JzEvS-0005zC-Vc for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 17:50:03 +0000 Received: from c-67-190-34-252.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([67.190.34.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 17:50:02 +0000 Received: from dann.church by c-67-190-34-252.hsd1.co.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 17:50:02 +0000 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: Dann Church Subject: Re: iwl4965 - =?utf-8?b?d3BhX3N1cHBsaWNhbnQ=?= can't see 5Ghz frequencies - 2.6.26-rc1 kernel Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 17:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: (sfid-20080522_195015_507128_F17F01CD) References: <1210352234.3763.23.camel@X61.NetworkingUnlimited.com> <1ba2fa240805091712gccaec9cibdab621e8d1c9ba7@mail.gmail.com> <1210430367.3778.9.camel@X61.NetworkingUnlimited.com> <1210434402.3787.7.camel@X61.NetworkingUnlimited.com> <1ba2fa240805101156q4dc52c2bt47d2f6e51b611eea@mail.gmail.com> <1210456110.3787.26.camel@X61.NetworkingUnlimited.com> <1ba2fa240805101506p78c3eeb6q6e980ac4200fd56f@mail.gmail.com> <1210474179.3787.31.camel@X61.NetworkingUnlimited.com> <1ba2fa240805120950mf983e97qac4cdfa2c84b6662@mail.gmail.com> <1210617467.3792.4.camel@X61.DFGI.com> <1ba2fa240805220953u746d3429q50faa1885104cadb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Tomas Winkler writes: > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Vincent C Jones > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 19:50 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > > > >> Meanwhile we've reproduced the wpa_supplicant issue... > >> > > > > That is great news. Let me know when it is time to test again... > > Please try this one. I've just pasted that in so it's might be > white-space-wise broken I have this same issue running fedora core 9 with a kernel version 2.6.25.3-18.fc9.i686.PAE. Any chance this patch would work on such a kernel (assuming I recompiled it from source)?