From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:37560 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752574Ab0ATKpO (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:45:14 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NXY3f-0004cD-79 for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:45:07 +0100 Received: from ppp85-141-66-119.pppoe.mtu-net.ru ([85.141.66.119]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:45:07 +0100 Received: from passshok by ppp85-141-66-119.pppoe.mtu-net.ru with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:45:07 +0100 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: Pavel Ulpi Subject: Re: ath5k: 2.6.32-rc6 "no further txbuf available, dropping packet" Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4AF99EF9.4040408@nets.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Bob Copeland writes: > Yes, there is a good reason (there are no buffers for the hardware to > play with). Actually mac80211 tx is never supposed to return anything > but TX_OK. > > Try this patch (it needs work which is why it's not upstream yet): > > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/56785/ > I'm using the same configuration. This patch solved the problem for me in AP mode too.