From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50393 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750896AbaLXCuG (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2014 21:50:06 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y3c1T-0001Ms-DQ for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 03:50:03 +0100 Received: from 095-096-207-026.static.chello.nl ([95.96.207.26]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 03:50:03 +0100 Received: from webmaster1989 by 095-096-207-026.static.chello.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 03:50:03 +0100 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: Melroy van den Berg Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] IBSS network crashes after one device leaves network Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 02:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: (sfid-20141224_035031_154794_CD60864C) References: <54455DDF.50305@rempel-privat.de> (sfid-20141020_211003_234775_62CEB57E) <1413833356.32358.4.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <5446660B.4040602@rempel-privat.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Oleksij Rempel writes: > hmm.. suddenly rate scaling is not singe limitation of ath9k-htc. > Firmware keeps some information for each STA and trying to reduce usb > bandwidth. If i understand it correctly, ath10k works in the same way. > It means, early or soon we need to work with some hard limits. I think it's exactly the same limit as for the AP mode. See: https://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/2013-April/010513.html There should be some solution, atleast the IBSS network shouldn't crash.