From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CRDA and ath5k with no country code in EEPROM
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:13:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3r5n1o9ds.fsf@intrepid.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e891003301140p850093aya4ea6e1951e7ab9c@mail.gmail.com> (Luis R. Rodriguez's message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:40:08 -0700")
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com> writes:
>> Software (the official Atheros driver, to be precise) says 0 isn't
>> exactly US.
>> Hardware (card) manufacturer says 0 isn't US.
>
> Would it make you happy if I send a patch to clarify that?
That would fix a good part of the problem, yes. TIA.
> I've indicated that your card is already working as it was designed.
But that's not the case.
The Atheros _chips_ are probably working as designed. The card(s) does
not, since it was designed for European market, and its designer
confirms this. Yet, by default, this card (+ driver) enables channels
which should be disabled in Europe, and disables others, which should be
available.
This is caused by interaction between two pieces - the driver and the
card. Most probably each one of them, alone, is not at fault.
> The EEPROM is not something that was designed for end users to modify.
Though I'm not end user, I will leave it for others to modify, no
problem. I only need a proof (such as the driver printing "US") it
should be modified.
> Who programmed your EEPROM choose that for a reason, and only they and
> as per Atheros's documentation would know what the goal was,
and those who were told about it. The stated goal is known, and I assume
the calibration data is available as well (I don't have these cards
physically ATM).
> If you want to muck with the EEPROM/code for regulatory compliance
> that is up to you and that is simply not supported due to a few
> things. One of them is calibration data which may or not be available
> for the region you would choose blindly. Properly enabling users to
> change their regulatory domain at their own whim really requires more
> involvement, sure you'd be able to use some additional channels but it
> by no means would mean that they are in compliance or that the EIRP
> you use hits the actual desired target. The important part really is
> compliance.
Precisely. To be compliant I have to restrict usage to a specific set of
frequencies. Unfortunately it's a different set than the one in US.
> The regulatory code on for the Atheros drivers enables usage only of
> the channels dictated by the EEPROM and what we in software match that
> EEPROM code to tables in software. This is by design. The Linux
> regulatory framework allows you to further restrict the device further
> but for Atheros cards if you change countries you will not get new
> channels if your original programmed regulatory domain does not allow
> for it.
Yes, and it fits the needs nicely - if the card manufacturer's idea
about meaning of the EEPROM matches the driver.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-30 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-28 20:52 CRDA and ath5k with no country code in EEPROM Krzysztof Halasa
2010-03-28 23:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-29 19:15 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-03-29 19:22 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-29 19:49 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-03-29 19:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-29 20:48 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-03-29 22:00 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-30 11:41 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-03-30 16:28 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-30 18:21 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-03-30 18:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-30 20:13 ` Krzysztof Halasa [this message]
2010-03-30 18:49 ` Christian Lamparter
2010-03-30 18:52 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-30 20:33 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-03-30 22:07 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-31 0:26 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-03-30 22:11 ` Christian Lamparter
2010-03-30 6:42 ` Holger Schurig
2010-03-30 11:46 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-03-29 20:04 ` Christian Lamparter
2010-03-29 20:54 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-03-29 21:57 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3r5n1o9ds.fsf@intrepid.localdomain \
--to=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox