linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mario Vietri" <m.vietri@sns.it>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:51:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <web-129660237@sns.it> (raw)

Dear Sirs,

I have a pc with an Intel Card, Intel Corporation Centrino 
Advanced-N 6235 [8086:088e] (rev 24), driven by iwlwifi. I 
have installed the backports version of iwlwifi.

The card and the driver work flawlessly. I am having troubles, 
though, when I try two build two   virtual interfaces on this 
card, one in Station mode and the other in AP mode.

The output of iw list states, among other things, that:

Supported interface modes: 
                                                            │
                  * IBSS
                  * managed
                  * AP
                  * AP/VLAN
                  * monitor
                  * P2P-client
                  * P2P-GO
         software interface modes (can always be added):
                  * AP/VLAN
                  * monitor
         valid interface combinations:
                  * #{ managed } <= 1, #{ AP, P2P-GO } <= 1,
                    total <= 2, #channels <= 1, STA/AP BI must 
match
                  * #{ managed } <= 2, #{ P2P-client } <= 1,
                    total <= 2, #channels <= 1


I have interpreted this to mean that I can put my card into AP 
mode (I did, it works). The "valid interface combinations" 
appeared to state (if I read them right) that I can have at 
most one vif in station mode, 1 vif in AP mode, for a grand 
total of two, provided that they are on the same channel, and 
provided that


  STA/AP BI must match


What does this mean? I have been unable to find this on 
Google, and several posts at moderately knowledgeable BBs like 
SuperUser, StackOverflow and the like have provided no 
enlightenment.

Since clients connecting to my AP are so far unable to obtain
an IP address from my network, I am wondering whether this
requirement, whose meaning I completely ignore, is the source
of the problem.

  

Do you think you can help me out on this one?


Cheers,


Mario
Prof. Mario Vietri
Scuola Normale Superiore
56100 Pisa
Italia

Tel.: 39-050-509096
FAX:  39-050-509045
Cell: 39-333-7877992

                 reply	other threads:[~2013-09-25  7:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=web-129660237@sns.it \
    --to=m.vietri@sns.it \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).