Re: rt73usb Access point status

[Jon Fairbairn <jon.fairbairn@cl.cam.ac.uk>]

"Christoph .J Thompson"
<cjsthompson@gmail.com>
writes:

> On Sat, 2 May 2009 11:34:31 +0100
> Luis Correia <luis.f.correia@gmail.com> wrote:
>> No, the bug is not in hostapd.
>>=20
>> As Johannes says, the bug is in the driver.
>> Apparently, the driver is unable to get the ACK from the hardware an=
d
>> thus unable to report that ACK back to hostapd.
>>=20
>> So the hostapd hack works, as long as there are enough room for
>> retransmit supposely lost frames.
>>=20
>> I can't explain this well enough in English, sorry.
>
> Apparently there is no bug in neither hostapd nor the
> driver. From what I understood the hardware is incapable
> of doing it or the firmware needs to be fixed.

Is there any prospec of persuading Ralink either to release
a mended version of the firmware or to free the old version?

What is it that Alexandre Becholey is doing, though? It
looked promising to me.

>> To be completely honest with you in this whole AP issue, here's what=
 I
>> used to say to my friends: "if you need an AP working flawlessly und=
er
>> Linux, got with the Atheros b/g hardware".
>> But that was in the madwifi days, I haven't tested it with the curre=
nt
>> mac80211 based driver.
>
> But if he can't use anything else than a USB dongle than
> Atheros is useless.

Quite. No free PCI slots, for example.

> In my case I can't use anything else than a USB dongle on
> my AP because there's only one case you can use for this
> embedded board (ALIX 2d3) and it doesn't have a hole for
> an external antenna as it's the model with 3 ethernet
> ports.

I think my solution to that would involve HSS tools, but
your point is a good one.

--=20
J=C3=B3n Fairbairn                                 Jon.Fairbairn@cl.cam=
=2Eac.uk


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireles=
s" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html