From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
To: David Decotigny <ddecotig@gmail.com>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: rtl8723au: core: endianness issues
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:33:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wrfj4mlvoo24.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433724182-657-1-git-send-email-ddecotig@gmail.com> (David Decotigny's message of "Sun, 7 Jun 2015 17:43:00 -0700")
David Decotigny <ddecotig@gmail.com> writes:
> The code shows a couple inconsistencies (described in commit
> descriptions) which would not be an issue on little-endian cpus, but
> could cause breakage on non-LE cpus. Note: I could not test on real
> hardware, these patches created based on sparse reports.
>
> Hostory:
> - resending the same patches to correct recipients, only changed
> commit descriptions (credits to Dan Carpenter)
>
> ############################################
> # Patch Set Summary:
>
> David Decotigny (2):
> staging: rtl8723au: core: avoid bitwise arithmetic with forced
> endianness
> staging: rtl8723au: core: remove redundant endianness conversion
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Looks fine to me, however if you fiddle with this same value twice,
wouldn't it be better to do it in one patch?
Cheers,
Jes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-25 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-08 0:43 [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: rtl8723au: core: endianness issues David Decotigny
2015-06-08 0:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: rtl8723au: core: avoid bitwise arithmetic with forced endianness David Decotigny
2015-06-08 0:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: rtl8723au: core: remove redundant endianness conversion David Decotigny
2015-06-08 8:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: rtl8723au: core: endianness issues Dan Carpenter
2015-06-25 14:33 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=wrfj4mlvoo24.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=jes.sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=ddecotig@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).