From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59501 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750779AbcB2Xwy (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:52:54 -0500 From: Jes Sorensen To: Julian Calaby Cc: linux-wireless , Kalle Valo , Larry Finger Subject: Re: [PATCH 111/113] rtl8xxxu: Print a warning if flushing the FIFO fails References: <1456783551-28315-1-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> <1456783551-28315-112-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:52:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Julian Calaby's message of "Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:48:17 +1100") Message-ID: (sfid-20160301_005256_948444_A911CFB0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Julian Calaby writes: > Hi Jes, > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:05 AM, wrote: >> From: Jes Sorensen >> >> Only print a warning if the FIFO flush fails, as opposed to printing >> the status unconditionally. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen > > Should this be squashed into the previous patch? If you want to have the whole set reposted for a nitpick, sure. If Kalle prefers to squash the two together, I am fine with that. Jes