From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
To: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Enable data frame reception in rtl8xxxu_start
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:31:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wrfj611xba2p.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5628E9AB.1060907@einfach.org> (Bruno Randolf's message of "Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:50:35 +0100")
Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org> writes:
> On 10/22/2015 02:42 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> Making things work against random kernel versions of OpenWRT is not
>> particularly "credible". If the driver needs hacks to work with older
>> kernels, then they should be applied for the older kernels. Linux does
>> not have a history of carrying hacks in current drivers to accommodate
>> older kernels.
>
> Well forget OpenWRT. The point is that this is not a hack - it's the
> behavior that mac80211 expects and documents and moreover it does NOT
> pass more data frames than before.
>
> It does not pass more data frames before association because the RCR
> RCR_ACCEPT_AP bit is not set and the RCR_CHECK_BSSID_* bits are set.
I have gone back and looked more at the vendor drivers over this issue.
Most versions of the vendor driver consistently mess with both FLTMAP*
and RCR, and disable packets when they go into a non-assoc state, but
non-assoc to the vendor driver also means non-AP, non-monitor, etc.
I really would like to know more about the difference between RCR and
FLTMAP registers - Larry is there a chance you could try and ping your
Realtek contacts about this?
For now I have applied your patch and pushed it into both branches.
Cheers,
Jes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-23 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-21 21:28 [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Enable data frame reception in rtl8xxxu_start Bruno Randolf
2015-10-21 23:13 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-10-22 7:50 ` Bruno Randolf
2015-10-22 13:10 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-10-22 13:22 ` Bruno Randolf
2015-10-22 13:42 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-10-22 13:50 ` Bruno Randolf
2015-10-23 20:31 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2015-10-23 16:30 ` Larry Finger
2015-10-30 19:32 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=wrfj611xba2p.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=jes.sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=br1@einfach.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).