From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>
To: "João Pedro Taveira" <joao.p.taveira@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mac802154: TX results and ACK processing
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:56:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140819165640.GC1116@omega> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ018wCNUhoJQvM+bYFGqEui1KLZjHe_X3ieYr_+hVcJXQkffA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 05:27:43PM +0100, João Pedro Taveira wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I thought RPL needs the LQI value. For the LQI value I (we) thought about
> > to handle the LQI value like the wireless signal strength.
> RPL doesn't need LQI.It depends on RPL configurations and parameters,
> which metrics it will use. One could setup RPL to use metrics based on
> ETX, LQI, battery voltage, mains, temperature, ... sky is the limit.
ok, we currently doesn't offer any of these information.
> >
> > If you have a wireless card, simple type:
> >
> > "iw dev $WLAN_DEV scan dump" (maybe you need to run a scan first). You will
> > see all access points and their signal strength etc.
> >
> > We should have something similar for all neighbor nodes and LQI values,
> > tx failures and similar information.
> >
> >> What's your opinion?
> >>
> >
> > I think we should get a working mac layer with a working 6LoWPAN layer
> > at first, then we can do effort to implement RPL or RFC6775.
> RPL works on IPv6 layer, it doesn't depend on 6lowpan. I already
> started to implement several RFCs but not MHROF. Right now, I can
> connect linux and contiki sensors using rpl_of_of0, but this is the
> basic. To get mhrof working with default configurations as defined on
> RFCs, ETX should be available. My problem is that RPL works on IPv6
> layer, but ETX it's only available on link layer. Some abstraction
> should be available to allow implementation of RPL metrics and RPL
> Objective functions to make use of any metrics on existing link
> protocols.
>
Okay, then this is a general question to your implementation. Maybe you
ask this on netdev and not related to 802.15.4/802.15.4 6LoWPAN. It's
more a IPv6 question.
We don't support to offer these information in any case. Maybe you want
to try to implement/test your RPL implementation for 802.11, there you
have more change to access information like this. Maybe in future we
offer these information in mac802154.
- Alex
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-19 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-19 13:33 mac802154: TX results and ACK processing João Pedro Taveira
2014-08-19 15:23 ` Alexander Aring
2014-08-19 16:27 ` João Pedro Taveira
2014-08-19 16:56 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140819165640.GC1116@omega \
--to=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=joao.p.taveira@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox