From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:47531 "EHLO mail-wg0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752973AbaIHKnc (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2014 06:43:32 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id k14so487533wgh.10 for ; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 03:43:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 12:43:28 +0200 From: Alexander Aring Subject: Re: 6lowpan raw socket problems Message-ID: <20140908104326.GC6981@omega> References: <1409638090.3120.71.camel@jrissane-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20140902071214.GA25800@omega> <20140902072627.GB25800@omega> <5405D284.7020606@xsilon.com> <20140902144327.GA15189@omega> <5405D961.4060006@xsilon.com> <20140902153742.GC15189@omega> <5405EB08.5040006@xsilon.com> <20140902162630.GD15189@omega> <5406123E.2080100@xsilon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5406123E.2080100@xsilon.com> Sender: linux-wpan-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Martin Townsend Cc: Simon Vincent , linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 07:53:50PM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote: > On 02/09/14 17:26, Alexander Aring wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 05:06:32PM +0100, Simon Vincent wrote: > >>This is not a problem. There is a fix elsewhere for that. > >> > >>I am using local-link addresses. > >> > >>I am seeing funny things like: > >>lowpan0: received packet from fe80::203:9a00:41:c864 -> > >>7707:ffff:300:0:9a:300:7b3b:3a1a > >> > >>Src address fe80::203:9a00:41:c864 does not exist on the network and > >>destination address 7707:ffff:300:0:9a:300:7b3b:3a1a does not. > >> > >Where do you capture this? You know that wireshark on a lowpan interface > >is broken? > > > >- Alex > >-- > >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in > >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Hi Alex, > > I'm working with Simon and these are from printf statements, we've stepped > through the code and seen the same problem. > > It would be nice to have a better testing environment, you mentioned that > you have a virtual setup, does this allow for multiple nodes sending > receiving packets like the contiki one? if so do you have instructions on > how to setup? > for testing you could use fakelb or tony's serial virtual interface [0]. I didn't test both of them, but we need some testing interface of course. The virtual serial interface require the serial driver. Sorry for my late reply. [0] https://github.com/tcheneau/virtual-ieee802154-serial