From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: Simon Vincent <simon.vincent@xsilon.com>,
linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-wpan] 6lowpan: ensure header compression does not corrupt ipv6 header
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 21:26:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140920192653.GA4386@omega> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ABADC32-3A37-403D-8482-6158F91F3117@holtmann.org>
Hi Marcel,
good to see you. I think this is bug occurs also in 6LoWPAN bluetooth.
I cc Jukka here.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 04:55:27PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I am missing a proper commit message with explanation here. One-line subject online commit message are really only ever acceptable if it is a dead trivial fix. And even then I prefer a proper commit message with detailed explanation what the patch changes and why.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Vincent <simon.vincent@xsilon.com>
> > ---
> > net/ieee802154/6lowpan_rtnl.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan_rtnl.c b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan_rtnl.c
> > index 6591d27..cb94504 100644
> > --- a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan_rtnl.c
> > +++ b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan_rtnl.c
> > @@ -71,6 +71,26 @@ struct lowpan_dev_record {
> > struct list_head list;
> > };
> >
> > +union lowpan_addr_u {
> > + /* IPv6 needs big endian here */
> > + __be64 extended;
> > + __be16 short_;
>
> I do not like short_ as field name. I know why you are doing this, but why bother. You always access via u.short anyway. Then again, it seems it is not used at all.
>
Sorry my fault. I used "short_" in the rework, I don't like it too, but
would to change it in future. Do you have a better name?
The not using of this parameter is... that it should be using but we
doesn't support it right now. :-)
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* don't save pan id, it's intra pan */
> > +struct lowpan_addr {
> > + /* non converted address mode bits here
> > + * make this at first, improve memcmp on this struct
> > + */
> > + __le16 mode;
> > + union lowpan_addr_u u;
>
> If you do not need the union declaration by itself then you can just add it into the struct directly. No need for these extra _u declaration.
>
yea, he mainly grab code from other branch and I used the union for some
parameter. But of course for this patch he can change it.
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct lowpan_addr_info {
> > + struct lowpan_addr daddr;
> > + struct lowpan_addr saddr;
> > +};
> > +
> > static inline struct
> > lowpan_dev_info *lowpan_dev_info(const struct net_device *dev)
> > {
> > @@ -85,14 +104,21 @@ static inline void lowpan_address_flip(u8 *src, u8 *dest)
> > (dest)[IEEE802154_ADDR_LEN - i - 1] = (src)[i];
> > }
> >
> > +static inline struct
> > +lowpan_addr_info *lowpan_skb_priv(const struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +{
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(skb_headroom(skb) < sizeof(struct lowpan_addr_info));
> > + return (struct lowpan_addr_info *)(skb->data -
> > + sizeof(struct lowpan_addr_info));
> > +}
> > +
> > static int lowpan_header_create(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> > unsigned short type, const void *_daddr,
> > const void *_saddr, unsigned int len)
> > {
> > const u8 *saddr = _saddr;
> > const u8 *daddr = _daddr;
> > - struct ieee802154_addr sa, da;
> > - struct ieee802154_mac_cb *cb = mac_cb_init(skb);
> > + struct lowpan_addr_info *info;
> >
> > /* TODO:
> > * if this package isn't ipv6 one, where should it be routed?
> > @@ -106,41 +132,15 @@ static int lowpan_header_create(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> > raw_dump_inline(__func__, "saddr", (unsigned char *)saddr, 8);
> > raw_dump_inline(__func__, "daddr", (unsigned char *)daddr, 8);
> >
> > - lowpan_header_compress(skb, dev, type, daddr, saddr, len);
> > -
> > - /* NOTE1: I'm still unsure about the fact that compression and WPAN
> > - * header are created here and not later in the xmit. So wait for
> > - * an opinion of net maintainers.
> > - */
> > - /* NOTE2: to be absolutely correct, we must derive PANid information
> > - * from MAC subif of the 'dev' and 'real_dev' network devices, but
> > - * this isn't implemented in mainline yet, so currently we assign 0xff
> > - */
> > - cb->type = IEEE802154_FC_TYPE_DATA;
> > -
> > - /* prepare wpan address data */
> > - sa.mode = IEEE802154_ADDR_LONG;
> > - sa.pan_id = ieee802154_mlme_ops(dev)->get_pan_id(dev);
> > - sa.extended_addr = ieee802154_devaddr_from_raw(saddr);
> > + info = lowpan_skb_priv(skb);
> >
> > - /* intra-PAN communications */
> > - da.pan_id = sa.pan_id;
> > + info->daddr.mode = IEEE802154_ADDR_LONG;
> > + memcpy(&info->daddr.u.extended, daddr, sizeof(info->daddr.u.extended));
> >
> > - /* if the destination address is the broadcast address, use the
> > - * corresponding short address
> > - */
> > - if (lowpan_is_addr_broadcast(daddr)) {
> > - da.mode = IEEE802154_ADDR_SHORT;
> > - da.short_addr = cpu_to_le16(IEEE802154_ADDR_BROADCAST);
> > - } else {
> > - da.mode = IEEE802154_ADDR_LONG;
> > - da.extended_addr = ieee802154_devaddr_from_raw(daddr);
> > - }
> > + info->saddr.mode = IEEE802154_ADDR_LONG;
> > + memcpy(&info->saddr.u.extended, saddr, sizeof(info->daddr.u.extended));
> >
> > - cb->ackreq = !lowpan_is_addr_broadcast(daddr);
> > -
> > - return dev_hard_header(skb, lowpan_dev_info(dev)->real_dev,
> > - type, (void *)&da, (void *)&sa, 0);
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int lowpan_give_skb_to_devices(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > @@ -338,13 +338,74 @@ err:
> > return rc;
> > }
> >
> > +static int lowpan_header(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct ieee802154_addr sa, da;
> > + struct ieee802154_mac_cb *cb = mac_cb_init(skb);
> > + struct lowpan_addr_info info;
> > + void *daddr, *saddr;
> > +
> > + memcpy(&info, lowpan_skb_priv(skb), sizeof(info));
> > +
> > + /* TODO complicated bug why we support extended_addr only */
>
> This is not a good comment. Explain why since especially only extended addresses are supported, I have no idea on why we are adding all these struct addition in the first place.
>
again my fault. Just a hint for me in rework branch to add some better
comment there, or fix the issue.
> > + daddr = &info.daddr.u.extended;
> > + saddr = &info.saddr.u.extended;
> > +
> > + lowpan_header_compress(skb, dev, ETH_P_IPV6, daddr, saddr, skb->len);
> > +
> > + /* NOTE1: I'm still unsure about the fact that compression and WPAN
> > + * header are created here and not later in the xmit. So wait for
> > + * an opinion of net maintainers.
> > + */
>
> Now I wonder why this has not yet been answered and you are in the need of copying around. Maybe this should have been addressed by now.
>
Very old comment, should be removed.
> > + /* NOTE2: to be absolutely correct, we must derive PANid information
> > + * from MAC subif of the 'ldev' and 'wdev' network devices, but
> > + * this isn't implemented in mainline yet, so currently we assign 0xff
> > + */
same.
> > + cb->type = IEEE802154_FC_TYPE_DATA;
> > +
> > + /* prepare wpan address data */
> > + sa.mode = IEEE802154_ADDR_LONG;
> > + sa.pan_id = ieee802154_mlme_ops(dev)->get_pan_id(dev);
> > + sa.extended_addr = ieee802154_devaddr_from_raw(saddr);
> > +
> > + /* intra-PAN communications */
> > + da.pan_id = sa.pan_id;
> > +
> > + /* if the destination address is the broadcast address, use the
> > + * corresponding short address
> > + */
> > + if (lowpan_is_addr_broadcast((const u8 *)daddr)) {
> > + da.mode = IEEE802154_ADDR_SHORT;
> > + da.short_addr = cpu_to_le16(IEEE802154_ADDR_BROADCAST);
> > + cb->ackreq = false;
> > + } else {
> > + da.mode = IEEE802154_ADDR_LONG;
> > + da.extended_addr = ieee802154_devaddr_from_raw(daddr);
> > + cb->ackreq = true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return dev_hard_header(skb, lowpan_dev_info(dev)->real_dev,
> > + ETH_P_IPV6, (void *)&da, (void *)&sa, 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > static netdev_tx_t lowpan_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> > {
> > struct ieee802154_hdr wpan_hdr;
> > - int max_single;
> > + int max_single, ret;
> >
> > pr_debug("package xmit\n");
> >
> > + /* We must take a copy of the skb before we modify/replace the ipv6
> > + * header as the header could be used elsewhere
> > + */
> > + skb = skb_unshare(skb, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +
need to be GFP_ATOMIC, xmit callback has atomic context.
- Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-20 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-19 15:42 [PATCH linux-wpan] 6lowpan: ensure header compression does not corrupt ipv6 header Simon Vincent
2014-09-20 6:48 ` Martin Townsend
2014-09-20 14:55 ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-09-20 19:26 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
2014-09-21 7:31 ` Alexander Aring
2014-09-22 8:23 ` Alexander Aring
2014-09-22 8:29 ` Alexander Aring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140920192653.GA4386@omega \
--to=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=simon.vincent@xsilon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).