From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:48212 "EHLO mail-wg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751819AbaLSLCm (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:02:42 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id k14so993967wgh.29 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 03:02:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 12:02:35 +0100 From: Alexander Aring Subject: Re: [PATCH bluetooth-next RESEND] at86rf230: cleanup check on trac status Message-ID: <20141219110231.GA15986@omega> References: <1418981810-17663-1-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com> <6AC2F7D7-DA76-4D7C-B49C-485E3F25414F@holtmann.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6AC2F7D7-DA76-4D7C-B49C-485E3F25414F@holtmann.org> Sender: linux-wpan-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:57:24AM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Alex, > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Schmidt > > --- > > drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c | 8 +++----- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree. > > I would however prefer that even these small patches get a commit message explaining why that is correct and now was wrong before. Does not have to be anything big, but at least some sort of commit message body clearly explaining it would be helpful. > Okay, thanks. I need to admit that writing commit messages in some cases is more work than to write the programming changes. Nevertheless I will try to change that. - Alex