From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>
To: "Guido Günther" <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Cc: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 6lowpan on a RPi using at86rf233
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:49:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150403184914.GC773@omega> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150403182744.GA8360@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 08:27:44PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 04:45:02PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 04:36:47PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm trying to get 6lowpan to work using bluetooth-next on the above
> > > hardware[1]. I'm currently using bluetooth-next as of
> > > baf880a96859cca79208122e555e7efeabd16e4d . When I do a:
> > >
> > > iwpan dev wpan0 set pan_id 0xbeef
> > >
> > > I get:
> > >
> > > command failed: Device or resource busy (-16)
> > >
> >
> > you can set the pan_id when you interface is down only.
>
> There was an ifplugd on the pi which continued to up the device -
> damnit. Sorry for the noise. I can now ping the two devices but am
> seeing massive packet loss:
>
> # ping6 -s 20 -I lowpan0 fe80::f836:9287:905c:a684
> PING fe80::f836:9287:905c:a684(fe80::f836:9287:905c:a684) from fe80::cb23:b779:742d:4fd2 lowpan0: 20 data bytes
> 28 bytes from fe80::f836:9287:905c:a684: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=27.7 ms
> 28 bytes from fe80::f836:9287:905c:a684: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=12.7 ms
> 28 bytes from fe80::f836:9287:905c:a684: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=12.7 ms
> ^C
> --- fe80::f836:9287:905c:a684 ping statistics ---
> 16 packets transmitted, 3 received, 81% packet loss, time 15017ms
>
> Will need to dig into this again.
>
ah, maybe I know why. Did you use the openlabs dts at86rf233 entry?
Try this:
&spi {
status = "okay";
at86rf233@0 {
compatible = "atmel,at86rf233";
spi-max-frequency = <7500000>;
reg = <0>;
interrupts = <23 4>;
interrupt-parent = <&gpio>;
reset-gpio = <&gpio 24 1>;
sleep-gpio = <&gpio 25 1>;
xtal-trim = /bits/ 8 <0x0F>;
};
};
The openlabs entry uses a clock ~ 500kHz I experience similar issues with
such a low clock. Also the xtal-trim should be "somewhat correct" for the
openlabs transceivers. I need HF equipment to really test this value I
supposed datasheet values.
- Alex
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-03 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20150403143647.GA6266@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
2015-04-03 14:45 ` 6lowpan on a RPi using at86rf233 Alexander Aring
2015-04-03 18:27 ` Guido Günther
2015-04-03 18:38 ` Alexander Aring
2015-04-07 11:49 ` Guido Günther
2015-04-07 19:07 ` Alexander Aring
2015-04-09 9:06 ` Guido Günther
2015-04-09 10:21 ` Alexander Aring
2015-04-03 18:49 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150403184914.GC773@omega \
--to=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=agx@sigxcpu.org \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox