From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC bluetooth-next] ieee802154: 6lowpan: set ackreq when needed
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:02:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150528100130.GA716@omega> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5566D03B.7080209@osg.samsung.com>
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:22:19AM +0200, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 27/05/15 12:12, Alexander Aring wrote:
> >This patch sets the acknowledge request bit inside the 802.15.4 mac
> >header when frame retries is 0 or above. The other frame retries value
> >which is -1 indicates that the transmitter doesn't care about an
> >acknowledge frame which will be ignored after transmitting if the node
> >sends anyway an ack frame after receiving. This is currently unnecessary
> >traffic if the max frame retries parameter is -1. I hope transceivers
> >which supports AACK handling will check on this bit and doesn't send an
> >ack frame after receiving.
>
> Do we know if AACK enbaled receivers really parse this and avoid sending the
> ACK? They should but I wonder if you did run any test for this.
>
I did a test with a running at86rf231 in monitor mode, I don't see ack
frames when this isn't set, so AACK handling should take care about this
bit.
Any other suggestions? I mean this patch makes sense, if we are in a
transmit mode that doesn't care about ack frame after transmit, then we
don't need to set the ack request bit, or?
- Alex
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-28 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-27 10:12 [RFC bluetooth-next] ieee802154: 6lowpan: set ackreq when needed Alexander Aring
2015-05-28 8:22 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-05-28 10:02 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150528100130.GA716@omega \
--to=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan@osg.samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox