From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from box.christofferholmstedt.se ([188.166.68.52]:47354 "EHLO box.christofferholmstedt.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933202AbbFJIlt (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2015 04:41:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 10:41:44 +0200 From: Christoffer Holmstedt Subject: Re: nl802154 enum misspelled, just send patch? Message-ID: <20150610084144.GB20831@arazu> References: <20150610082449.GA20831@arazu> <5577F5A0.9050100@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5577F5A0.9050100@gmail.com> Sender: linux-wpan-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Varka Bhadram Cc: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 02:00:24PM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote: > On 06/10/2015 01:54 PM, Christoffer Holmstedt wrote: > > >Hi > >While working on the CCA improvements to wpan-tools I noticed that one of the > >enums has a value misspelled. As the header is not in UAPI yet I suggest we > >fix this. > > > >NL802154_CCA_UWB_MULTIPEXED is missing an l (ell) in multiplexed. > > > >The header file is included in wpan-tools repository and available in the > >kernel. Should I just send a patch for bluetooth-next and then the new header > >file is copied over to wpan-tools repository or what is the procedure here? > > > >I assume normal procedure for more "stable" user-space software is that the > >kernel header file(s) should not be included in the user-space tool but instead > >included and linked against the kernel headers (from running system or similiar > >source). At the moment the nl802154 header is included in wpan-tools to make it > >easier to build while developing. > > > >So, should I send a patch for both bluetooth-next and wpan-tools or just > >bluetooth-next? > > Send patch for both trees . :-) > > -- > Varka Bhadram Will do. -- Christoffer Holmstedt