Linux IEEE 802.15.4 and 6LoWPAN development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Schmidt <s.schmidt@samsung.com>
To: 'Andrey Yurovsky' <andrey@snupi.com>, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org
Cc: 'Andrey Yurovsky' <yurovsky@gmail.com>, alex.aring@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] at86rf230: remove version check for AT86RF212
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:50:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <243a01d015e8$bb7cf930$3276eb90$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418339480-26681-1-git-send-email-andrey@snupi.com>

Hello.

On 12/12/14 00:11, Andrey Yurovsky wrote:
> From: Andrey Yurovsky <yurovsky@gmail.com>
>
> This version check allows the driver to only work with v1 hardware
> however there is no driver-facing difference with newer versions
> (confirmed by Atmel FAEs) so this check needlessly prevents the driver
> from being used with radios now in production.

Has anyone tested the driver with this new hardware yet? Or are the 
productions so early that there are now samples yet?

> Signed-off-by: Andrey Yurovsky <yurovsky@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c | 16 ++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
> b/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
> index 1c01356..007470f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
> @@ -1429,16 +1429,12 @@ at86rf230_detect_device(struct at86rf230_local
> *lp)
>   		break;
>   	case 7:
>   		chip = "at86rf212";
> -		if (version == 1) {
> -			lp->data = &at86rf212_data;
> -			lp->hw->flags |= IEEE802154_HW_LBT;
> -			lp->hw->phy->channels_supported[0] = 0x00007FF;
> -			lp->hw->phy->channels_supported[2] = 0x00007FF;
> -			lp->hw->phy->current_channel = 5;
> -			lp->hw->phy->symbol_duration = 25;
> -		} else {
> -			rc = -ENOTSUPP;
> -		}
> +		lp->data = &at86rf212_data;
> +		lp->hw->flags |= IEEE802154_HW_LBT;
> +		lp->hw->phy->channels_supported[0] = 0x00007FF;
> +		lp->hw->phy->channels_supported[2] = 0x00007FF;
> +		lp->hw->phy->current_channel = 5;
> +		lp->hw->phy->symbol_duration = 25;
>   		break;
>   	case 11:
>   		chip = "at86rf233";
>

Change looks good.

Reviewed-by: Stefan Schmidt <s.schmidt@samsung.com>

regards
Stefan Schmidt



  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-12  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-11 23:11 [PATCH] at86rf230: remove version check for AT86RF212 Andrey Yurovsky
2014-12-12  8:50 ` Stefan Schmidt [this message]
2014-12-12 15:08   ` Alexander Aring
2014-12-12 15:10 ` Alexander Aring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='243a01d015e8$bb7cf930$3276eb90$@samsung.com' \
    --to=s.schmidt@samsung.com \
    --cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrey@snupi.com \
    --cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yurovsky@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox