Linux IEEE 802.15.4 and 6LoWPAN development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arvid Brodin <arvid.brodin@alten.se>
To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dmitry.tarnyagin@lockless.no,
	alex.aring@gmail.com, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] netns: audit netdevice creation with IFLA_NET_NS_[PID|FD]
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 21:33:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D28237.9060009@alten.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CF9EA8.4080207@6wind.com>

On 2015-02-02 16:58, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 30/01/2015 21:00, Arvid Brodin a écrit :
>> On 2015-01-26 22:28, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> *snip*
>>> - HSR subsystem uses src_net to parse IFLA_HSR_SLAVE[1|2], but the netdevice has
>>>    the flag NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL, so the question is: does this netdevice really
>>>    supports x-netns? If not, the newlink handler should use the dest_net instead
>>>    of src_net, I can provide the patch.
>> *snip*
>>
>> As the author of the HSR driver, I'd like to answer this question, but unfortunately
>> I don't know what x-netns is. Neither Google nor Documentation/ has been particularly
>> helpful.
>>
>> Care to elaborate? (Maybe this is a moot point now that the patch has been accepted,
>> but I'd still like to understand, if you have the time to explain.)
> Basically, network namespaces (netns) allow you to run several independant
> instances of the linux networking stack.
> Network interfaces are bound to one netns. By default, only one netns exists
> (named init_net) when you boot your kernel.
> For logical interfaces, they are usually bound to a link layer. For example, if
> I understand well, hsr network interfaces receive and send their packets from
> two physical interfaces (IFLA_HSR_SLAVE[1|2]).
> Now imagine that these slaves are in a netns foo and the logical hsr interfaces
> in netns bar. You have a x-netns interface, the link layer part of the interface
> is not in the same netns than the upper part. A user will see the hsr interface
> in netns bar, but this interface will send a receive packet in netns foo.

Ok, so x-netns simply means cross-netns?

> Usually, to configure an interface like this, you create it in netns foo and you
> move it later to netns bar (ip link set hsr1 netns bar). The flag
> NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL forbids this operation, you cannot move it to another netns.
> But you still can create a x-netns interface:
> ip netns add foo
> ip link add hsr1 netns foo type hsr slave1 eth0 slave2 eth1
> ip netns exec foo ip link ls hsr1
> 
> => eth0 and eth1 are took from the current netns (because in the code, src_net
> is the current netns) but hsr1 is built in netns foo.
> 
> Now, the question is: does HSR really work across netns? Why is the flag
> NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL set?
> dev_forward_skb() may be used to forward an skbuff to another netns.

Here is the code snippet that sets NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL:
	/* Not sure about this. Taken from bridge code. netdev_features.h says
	 * it means "Does not change network namespaces".
	 */
	dev->features |= NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL;

HSR is a bit like a bridge since it forwards packets between interfaces on the 
same Ethernet network, and the bridge code sets NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL. And that's 
really all the reason for the inclusion of the flag - i.e. it should be removed
if it doesn't make sense.

So, does it make sense? I'm not sure exactly, but I don't think it makes sense
to have slaves that are in different namespaces - they are supposed to be part 
of the same ethernet network after all. But maybe having the HSR interface in a 
different namespace than the two slaves could make sense - this way you could 
force an application to only communicate using the HSR protocol, and not use any 
of the slave interfaces directly.

If you agree with the above, then I guess that means NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL should 
not be set?


> Note, that I got a panic when playing with hsr:
> ip link add hsr1 type hsr slave1 eth1 slave2 eth0
> ip link del hsr1
> => panic
> 
> I dig a bit:
> 1/ hsr_netdev_notify() supposes that the port will always be available when the
> notification is for an hsr interface. It's wrong. For example,
> netdev_wait_allrefs() may resend NETDEV_UNREGISTER.
> 2/ with a patch that ignores the notification when the port is NULL, I got a
> refcnt problem:
> [  327.372099] unregister_netdevice: waiting for hsr1 to become free. Usage count = -1

Thanks for the bug report! I'll take a look at it ASAP.


-- 
Arvid Brodin | Consultant (Linux)
ALTEN | Knarrarnäsgatan 7 | SE-164 40 Kista | Sweden
arvid.brodin@alten.se | www.alten.se/en/


  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-04 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-26 21:28 [PATCH net 0/2] netns: audit netdevice creation with IFLA_NET_NS_[PID|FD] Nicolas Dichtel
2015-01-26 21:28 ` [PATCH net 1/2] caif: remove wrong dev_net_set() call Nicolas Dichtel
2015-01-27 11:34   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-01-27 12:41     ` Bjørn Mork
2015-01-27 12:50       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-01-28 15:07   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-01-26 21:28 ` [PATCH net 2/2] vxlan: setup the right link netns in newlink hdlr Nicolas Dichtel
2015-01-27  9:34 ` [PATCH net 0/2] netns: audit netdevice creation with IFLA_NET_NS_[PID|FD] Alexander Aring
2015-01-27 10:32   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-01-27 12:23     ` Alexander Aring
2015-01-27 12:51       ` Alexander Aring
2015-01-27 13:28       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-01-27 14:06         ` Alexander Aring
2015-01-27 14:50           ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-01-27 20:26             ` Alexander Aring
2015-01-28  9:37               ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-01-29 22:20 ` David Miller
2015-01-30 20:00 ` Arvid Brodin
2015-02-02 15:58   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-02-04 20:33     ` Arvid Brodin [this message]
2015-02-05 14:34       ` Nicolas Dichtel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54D28237.9060009@alten.se \
    --to=arvid.brodin@alten.se \
    --cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dmitry.tarnyagin@lockless.no \
    --cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox