From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:53900 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751483AbbE0IrI (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 04:47:08 -0400 Message-ID: <55658489.70604@osg.samsung.com> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 10:47:05 +0200 From: Stefan Schmidt MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC bluetooth-next] atusb: add support for at86rf230 References: <1432471383-5029-1-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com> <20150527065454.GA712@omega> In-Reply-To: <20150527065454.GA712@omega> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wpan-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alexander Aring , linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de Hello. On 27/05/15 08:54, Alexander Aring wrote: > Stefan, > > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 02:43:03PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote: >> This patch adds support for the at86rf230 version check which is used >> by the rzusb stick. >> > is it okay to apply this patch for mainline for now? Yes, just send my reviewed-by for it. (You already want acked-by for this driver for me? I guess I wait until I send a patch to the maintainers file) > Then it's only a > question to make _better_ patches for the atusb firmware. Werner told me > that I should remove the a lot of ifdefs or we landing in a ifdef hell > which is like a well known IoT-OS and that's true. Was a dirty hack. I have yet to look at the firmware patches but if Werner already suggested some changes they should be taken into account. Especially if this would let us to ifdef hell. :) I was really happy to see the raven avr stick patches. This will extend the potential userbase for atusb and ieee802154 quite a bit. Thanks for working on this. regards Stefan Schmidt