From: Simon Vincent <simon.vincent@xsilon.com>
To: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>,
Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>,
linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The 802.15.4 Security Layer
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:58:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5582EAAD.1090605@xsilon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5582E6FA.3020101@osg.samsung.com>
Hi,
On 18/06/15 16:42, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 18/06/15 14:31, Alexander Aring wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I saw the latest discussion about the security layer and wants to open a
>> new thread about discussion for access this layer over nl802154 and
>> putting a "very easy to use" functionality into iwpan.
>>
>> I need to admit, I never tested myself this layer, also I told many
>> times that the step to put security layer functionality into nl802154 is
>> a necessary step. For that reason I declare the security layer as
>> broken.
>>
>> Several months ago I started to put these functionality into wpan-tools
>> and nl802154. It's just parsing a file at the moment and putting the all
>> relevant entries for key, device, seclevel tables in cfg802154. Nothing
>> more. These tables are handled like an ACL in 802.15.4 (so far I know)
>> and necessary to do the "key lookup" procedure, on receiving decrypted
>> frames.
>>
>> At weekend I will try to provide my stuff which I already have done and
>> will try to explain what the idea for the next necessary steps are. It's
>> just to start a discussion "How do deal with accessing llsec over
>> nl802154/cfg802154".
>>
>> After we can accessing the sec layer over nl802154, we can hopefully
>> remove
>> the old interface stuff.
>>
>> Does this sounds like a plan?
>
> I think this is a good idea and I would gladly gve this some testing
> next week. I bet Simon would do as well as he is currently looking
> into it.
Yes it would nice to tidy this all up and get a stable interface. I
currently have some time to look at this and do some testing.
- Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-18 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-18 12:31 The 802.15.4 Security Layer Alexander Aring
2015-06-18 15:42 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-06-18 15:58 ` Simon Vincent [this message]
2015-06-18 19:43 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-06-23 15:34 ` Simon Vincent
2015-06-23 16:00 ` Simon Vincent
2015-06-24 10:00 ` Alexander Aring
2015-06-24 14:01 ` Alexander Aring
2015-06-26 8:56 ` Simon Vincent
2015-06-26 9:32 ` Alexander Aring
2015-06-26 9:45 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-06-26 9:58 ` Alexander Aring
2015-06-26 10:14 ` Stefan Schmidt
2015-06-26 10:24 ` Alexander Aring
2015-06-26 11:20 ` Alexander Aring
2015-06-21 21:12 ` Alexander Aring
2015-06-22 12:33 ` Phoebe Buckheister
2015-06-23 11:03 ` Alexander Aring
2015-06-23 12:46 ` Phoebe Buckheister
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5582EAAD.1090605@xsilon.com \
--to=simon.vincent@xsilon.com \
--cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan@osg.samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox