From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:44625 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752221AbcCJQkv (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:40:51 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mrf24j40: fix security-enabled processing on inbound frames References: <56C60EBA.2070707@zopieux.com> <56D4A0C2.5090605@signal11.us> From: Stefan Schmidt Message-ID: <56E1A38F.6050108@osg.samsung.com> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:40:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56D4A0C2.5090605@signal11.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wpan-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alan Ott , zopieux , linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Aring Hello. On 29/02/16 20:49, Alan Ott wrote: > On 02/18/2016 01:34 PM, zopieux wrote: >> Fix the MRF24J40 handling of security-enabled frames so it does not >> block upon receiving such frames. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring >> Reported-by: Alexandre Macabies >> Tested-by: Alexandre Macabies >> --- >> When receiving a security-enabled IEEE 802.15.4 frame, the MRF24J40 >> triggers a SECIF interrupt that needs to be handled for RX processing >> to keep functioning properly. >> >> This patch enables the SECIF interrupt and makes the MRF ignores all >> hardware processing of security-enabled frames, that is handled by the >> ieee802154 stack instead. >> --- > > The "From" field of the email needs to have your real name in it. This > will be where the "Author" field in git comes from. > > It looks like there are a few separate things happening in this patch. > Maybe they should be broken out in to separate patches. I see: > > 1. The ieee802154.h part, > 2. The TX part, > 3. The RX part. > > The patch description only really describes the RX part. > zopieux, could you split the patch as Alan suggested and re-submitted the series? regards Stefan Schmidt