From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow LAPB users know which data were actually sent. Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:34:33 +0000 Message-ID: <20110318113433.39794ca5@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> References: <1300400422-8820-1-git-send-email-slapin@ossfans.org> <20110317235532.44c0e202@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20110318005220.GA9674@build.ihdev.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110318005220.GA9674@build.ihdev.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Sergey Lapin Cc: linux-x25@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Looks sensible but your patch doesn't add a user for it so what is it > > needed for ? > > I implement accessor for special equipment (acessing fiscal information) > which uses custom protocol over LAPB. As it is being implemented, > I actually wanted to know if this approach for using LAPB is good enough > for mainline submission, as I want to have kernel part to be in mainline. > I think I will have the rest of patches ready within two weeks. It seems sensible as an implementation to me so I would carry on using that model and then submit it with all the other bits when you are ready.